ArticleACS omega2023
Optimization Analysis of Particle Separation Parameters for a Standing Surface Acoustic Wave Acoustofluidic Chip.
Article in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visualizing extracellular vesicles in cancer: from biogenesis to theranostic applications.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Exosome Augmentation Technologies for Drug Delivery and Disease Treatment: A Review.Biomaterials research · 2026Review
- Integrated microfluidic platforms for extracellular vesicles: Separation, detection, and clinical translation.APL bioengineering · 2025Review
- Acoustofluidics: Technology Advances and Applications from 2022 to 2024.Analytical chemistry · 2025Review
- Design and Performance Analysis of Spiral Microchannels for Efficient Particle Separation Using Inertial Microfluidics.Micromachines · 2025Article
- A Review of SAW-Based Micro- and Nanoparticle Manipulation in Microfluidics.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Characterization of AI-enhanced magnetophoretic transistors operating in a tri-axial magnetic field for on-chip bioparticle sorting.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Development of Highly Efficient Lamb Wave Transducers toward Dual-Surface Simultaneous Atomization.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Review of Research Progress in Microfluidic Bioseparation and Bioassay.Micromachines · 2024Review
- Investigation on submicron particle separation and deflection using tilted-angle standing surface acoustic wave microfluidics.Heliyon · 2024Article
- The use of droplet-based microfluidic technologies for accelerated selection ofBiology methods & protocols · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microparticle separation technology is an important technology in many biomedical and chemical engineering applications from sample detection to disease diagnosis. Although a variety of microparticle separation techniques have been developed thus far, surface acoustic wave (SAW)-based microfluidic separation technology shows great potential because of its high throughput, high precision, and integration with polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) microchannels. In this work, we demonstrate an acoustofluidic separation chip that includes a piezoelectric device that generates tilted-angle standing SAWs and a permanently bonded PDMS microchannel. We established a mathematical model of particle motion in the microchannel, simulated the particle trajectory through finite element simulation and numerical simulation, and then verified the validity of the model through acoustophoresis experiments. To improve the performance of the separation chip, the influences of particle size, flow rate, and input power on the particle deflection distance were studied. These parameters are closely related to the separation purity and separation efficiency. By optimizing the control parameters, the separation of micron and submicron particles under different throughput conditions was achieved. Moreover, the separation samples were quantitatively analyzed by digital light scattering technology and flow cytometry, and the results showed that the maximum purity of the separated particles was ∼95%, while the maximum efficiency was ∼97%.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.