ArticleACS omega2023
Comparison of Perfluorocarbon Liquids Cytotoxicity Tests: Direct Contact Versus the Test on Liquid Extracts.
Article in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tyrosinase Cross-Linked PEG Hydrogels with DAT and DATT as Artificial Substrates: Design, Structure, and Functions.Biomacromolecules · 2026Article
- Revisiting ISO 10993-5 In Vitro Cytotoxicity Standard Tests for Evaluation of Extracellular Matrix-Based Biomaterials.International journal of biomaterials · 2026Article
- Application of high intensity focused ultrasound combined with nanomaterials in anti-tumor therapy.Drug delivery · 2024Review
- A minimum specification dataset for liquid ocular endotamponades: recommendations by a European expert panel.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024Article
- Pars plana vitrectomy for retinal detachment using perfluoro-n-octane as intraoperative tamponade: a multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority trial.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to compare the in vitro cytotoxicity tests according to the ISO 10993-5 (2009) standards using direct contact and the test on liquid extracts of compounds previously identified as possible toxic impurities in perfluorocarbon liquids (PFCLs) for use in vitreoretinal surgery. Compounds including perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), 1
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.