ArticleACS omega2023
Optimization and Uncertainty Quantification Method for Reservoir Stimulation through Carbonate Acidizing.
Article in ACS omega, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Quantitative evaluation of acid flow behavior in fractures and optimization of design parameters based on acid wormhole filtration losses.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Mechanistic analysis of matrix-acid treatment of carbonate formations: An experimental core flooding study.Heliyon · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reservoir stimulation is a widely used technique in the oil and gas industry for increasing the productivity of hydrocarbon reservoirs, most notably in carbonate formations. This work aims to develop an optimization workflow under uncertainty for matrix acidizing. A reactive transport model is implemented in a finite-element framework to simulate the initiation and propagation of dissolution channels in porous carbonate rock. The model is verified using an analytical solution. We utilize surrogate modeling based on polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) and Sobol indices to identify the most significant parameters. We investigate the effect of varying 12 identified parameters on the efficiency of the stimulation process using dimensionless groups, including the Damköhler, Peclet, and acid capacity numbers. Furthermore, the surrogate model reproduces the physics-based results accurately, including the dissolution channels, the pore volume to breakthrough, and the effective permeability of the stimulated rock. The developed workflow assesses how uncertainties propagate to the model's response, where the surrogate model is used to calculate the univariate effect. The global sensitivity analysis shows that the acid capacity number is the most significant parameter for the pore volume to breakthrough with the highest Sobol index. The marginal effect calculated for the individual parameter confirms the results from Sobol indices. This work provides a systematic workflow for uncertainty analysis and optimization applied to the processes of rock stimulation. Characterizing the impact of uncertainty provides physical insights and a better understanding of the matrix acidizing process.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.