Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36643354›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2023

Laparoscopic versus open resection for stage II/III rectal cancer in obese patients: A multicenter propensity score-based analysis of short- and long-term outcomes.

Tomonori Akagi, Kentaro Nakajima, Yasumitsu Hirano, Tomoya Abe, Ryo Inada, Yohei Kono, Hidefumi Shiroshita, Tetsuji Ohyama, Masafumi Inomata, Seiichiro Yamamoto and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The risk of postoperative complications is higher in stage I-III colorectal cancer patients with previous abdominal surgery: a propensity score matching analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Tomonori AkagiGastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery Oita University of Faculty of Medicine Oita Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0722-0343
Kentaro NakajimaGastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery NTT Tokyo Japan.
Yasumitsu HiranoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Saitama Medical University International Medical Center Saitama Japan.
Tomoya AbeDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Sendai City Medical Center Sendai Open Hospital Sendai Japan.
Ryo InadaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Kochi Health Sciences Center Kochi Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4452-6480
Yohei KonoGastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery Oita University of Faculty of Medicine Oita Japan.
Hidefumi ShiroshitaGastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery Oita University of Faculty of Medicine Oita Japan.
Tetsuji OhyamaBiostatistics Center Kurume University Fukuoka Japan.
Masafumi InomataGastroenterological and Pediatric Surgery Oita University of Faculty of Medicine Oita Japan.
Seiichiro YamamotoDepartment of Digestive Surgery Tokai University Hospital Isehara Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9879-1239
Takeshi NaitohDepartment of Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery Kitasato University School of Medicine Sagamihara Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4169-6334
Yoshiharu SakaiDepartment of Surgery Osaka Red Cross Hospital Osaka Japan.
Masahiko WatanabeDepartment of Surgery Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital Tokyo Japan.
Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
Oita University · JPKitasato Institute Hospital · JPKitasato University · JPKurume University · JPNTT Medical Center · JPOsaka Red Cross Hospital · JPSaitama Medical University · JPSendai Medical Center · JPTokai University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Whether a laparoscopic procedure can contribute to the improvement of clinical outcomes in obese patients with stage II/III rectal cancer compared to an open procedure remains unclear. Objective: This study evaluated the technical and oncological safety of laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery in obese patients (body mass index [BMI] ≥25 kg/m Patients and Methods: Data were collected from patients with pathological stage II/III rectal cancer and analyzed. Operations were performed via laparoscopic or open surgery from 2009 to 2013. A comparative analysis was performed after applying propensity score matching to the two cohorts (laparoscopic group and open group). The primary endpoint was 3-y relapse-free survival (RFS). Results: Overall, 524 eligible cases were collected from 51 institutions. Equal numbers of propensity score-matched patients were included in the laparoscopic (n = 193) group and open (n = 193) group. Although the rate of D3 lymph node dissection did not differ between the laparoscopic group (87.0%) and the open group (88.6%), the median number of harvested lymph nodes was significantly lower in the laparoscopic group versus open group (17.5 vs 21, Conclusion: The short- and long-term results of this large cohort study (UMIN ID: UMIN000033529) indicated that laparoscopic surgery in obese rectal cancer patients has advantageous short-term outcomes and no disadvantageous long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

laparoscopic surgerymulticenterobesepropensity score matchingrectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID36643354
PMCPMC9831897
OpenAlexW4285587821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.