ArticleJournal of dental sciences2023
Convergent angles of a tapered implant referred from the root profile of premolars.
Article in Journal of dental sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: Limited studies have discussed the convergent profiles regarding tapered implants based on biological considerations. This study analyzed the convergent angles (CAs) of premolar roots and imitated a tapered implant according to the anatomy of tooth roots. Materials and methods: A total of 60 single-rooted premolars were explored by micro-computed tomography. Every individual root was divided into 10 segments corono-apically, and the roots' buccolingual (BL) and mesiodistal (MD) CAs were measured by sections. To mimic a dental implant, the irregular shape of examined root cross-sections was transformed into a circular shape with equal areas. A biomimetic dental implant (BDI) was reconstructed and its CAs were compared with those of the natural roots' BL and MD at the examined levels and overall estimation. Results: In general, the maxillary and mandibular premolars demonstrated comparable CA patterns. However, significantly different CA patterns of BL, MD, and BDI were developed for both the maxillary and mandibular roots at the examined levels. The BL's CAs were greater than those CAs measured from the BDI and MD aspects, particularly for the sections at the middle and apical thirds of the roots. For overall CAs, the BDI's CAs were comparable with the average CAs of the BL and MD for both premolar groups. Conclusion: Instead of a cylindrical configuration, the BDI prototype demonstrated a tapered model with a continuous slope. The average CA of BDI was 14°-24°, serving as a biological reference for future tapered implant design and research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.