Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36643181›Full record

ArticleProcedia computer science2023

Towards a more general drug target interaction prediction model using transfer learning.

Derwin Suhartono, Muhammad Rizki Nur Majiid, Alif Tri Handoyo, Pandu Wicaksono, Henry Lucky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Procedia computer science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Derwin SuhartonoComputer Science Department, School of Computer Science, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, Indonesia 11480.
Muhammad Rizki Nur MajiidComputer Science Department, School of Computer Science, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, Indonesia 11480.
Alif Tri HandoyoComputer Science Department, School of Computer Science, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, Indonesia 11480.
Pandu WicaksonoComputer Science Department, School of Computer Science, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, Indonesia 11480.
Henry LuckyComputer Science Department, School of Computer Science, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, Indonesia 11480.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The topic of Drug-Target Interaction (DTI) topic has emerged nowadays since the COVID-19 outbreaks. DTI is one of the stages of finding a new cure for a recent disease. It determines whether a chemical compound would affect a particular protein, known as binding affinity. Recently, significant efforts have been devoted to artificial intelligence (AI) powered DTI. However, the use of transfer learning in DTI has not been explored extensively. This paper aims to make a more general DTI model by investigating DTI prediction method using Transfer learning. Three popular models will be tested and observed: CNN, RNN, and Transformer. Those models combined in several scenarios involving two extensive public datasets on DTI (BindingDB and DAVIS) to find the most optimum architecture. In our finding, combining the CNN model and BindingDB as the source data became the most recommended pre-trained model for real DTI cases. This conclusion was proved with the 6% AUPRC increase after fine-tuning the BindingDB pre-trained model to DAVIS dataset than without pre-training the model first.

Indexed as

deep learningdrug discoverydrug-target interactionSMILEStransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID36643181
PMCPMC9829421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.