ReviewCureus2023
Postmortem Genetic Testing in Sudden Unexpected Death: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular mechanisms of sudden unexplained death and recent updates on molecular autopsy strategies for forensic investigation.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Review
- Epilepsy-induced heart damage and sudep risk: ion channelopathies, calcium homeostasis, and the therapeutic potential of resveratrol.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Article
- [The NODOV study: a step towards structured post-mortem investigation in unexpected and unexplained deaths of young adults].TSG : tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen · 2025Article
- Fentanyl and Sudden Death-A Postmortem Perspective for Diagnosing and Predicting Risk.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Channelopathies in epilepsy: an overview of clinical presentations, pathogenic mechanisms, and therapeutic insights.Journal of neurology · 2024Review
- The analysis of SUDEP forensic autopsies leading to preventable events.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sudden unexpected death (SUD) is one of the challenging situations encountered in forensic medicine. As a rule, a comprehensive forensic assessment is performed to identify the cause of death in such cases; however, the absence of findings suggestive of a cause, i.e., a negative autopsy, warrants further investigation such as a molecular autopsy. In this review, we aim to highlight the genetic causes of SUD, tools used in a molecular autopsy, and the role of screening in surviving relatives. As per several guidelines, the most preferred samples for DNA extraction are whole blood and fresh frozen tissues. Furthermore, Sanger sequencing and next-generation sequencing are the technologies that are used for genetic analysis; the latter overcomes the former's drawbacks in terms of cost-effectiveness, time consumption, and the ability to sequence the whole exome. SUD have diverse etiologies; we can generally classify them into cardiac and non-cardiac causes. Regarding cardiac causes, many conditions having an underlying genetic basis are included, such as channelopathies and cardiomyopathies. Regarding non-cardiac causes of SUD, the main etiologies are epilepsy and metabolic disorders. Nevertheless, it has been proposed that there is a genetic overlap between channelopathies, especially long QT syndromes and epilepsy. Additionally, fatty acid oxidation disorders are major metabolic conditions that are caused by certain genetic mutations that can lead to SUD in infancy. Since many SUD causes have an underlying genetic mutation, it is important to understand the genetic variations not only to recognize the cause of death but also to undertake further preventive measures for surviving relatives. In conclusion, a molecular autopsy has a major role in the forensic examination of cases of SUD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.