ReviewEuropean cardiology2022
Scoring Systems to Predict Survival or Neurological Recovery after Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest.
Review in European cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prediction performance of scoring systems after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Using a Stifneck Select CollarTM for hands-free semiautomatic blood flow measurements: A user study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Factors Associated with Survival to Hospital Discharge in Cardiac Arrest by Poisoning: WAIVOR Score.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2025Observational
- Development and validation of machine learning-based prediction model for outcome of cardiac arrest in intensive care units.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Using artificial intelligence to optimize anti-seizure treatment and EEG-guided decisions in severe brain injury.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025Review
- Role of artificial intelligence in predicting neurological outcomes in postcardiac resuscitation.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Review
- Simultaneous prognostic score validation in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by a post-hoc analysis based on national multicenter registry.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Diagnostic Value of Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase Level Measured in the Emergency Department in Predicting Clinical Outcome in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Multicenter, Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Numerous prediction scores have been developed to better inform clinical decision-making following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), however, there is no consensus among clinicians over which score to use. The aim of this review was to identify and compare scoring systems to predict survival and neurological recovery in patients with OHCA. A structured literature search of the MEDLINE database was carried out from inception to December 2021. Studies developing or validating scoring systems to predict outcome following OHCA were selected. Relevant data were extracted and synthesised for narrative review. In total, 16 scoring systems were identified: one predicting the probability of return of spontaneous circulation, six predicting survival to hospital discharge and nine predicting neurological outcome. NULL-PLEASE and CAST are recommended as the best scores to predict mortality and neurological outcome, respectively, due to the extent of external validation, ease of use and high predictive value of the variables. Whether use of these scores can lead to more cost-effective service delivery remains unclear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.