ReviewTransgender health2022
Defining Desistance: Exploring Desistance in Transgender and Gender Expansive Youth Through Systematic Literature Review.
Review in Transgender health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the practice principles and beliefs of trans-care providers working with trans and detrans youth: A survey-based analysis.International journal of transgender health · 2025Article
- Principlism and contemporary ethical considerations for providers of transgender health care.International journal of transgender health · 2025Article
- Recognizing and responding to misleading trans health research.International journal of transgender health · 2024Article
- Gender detransition: A critical review of the literature.Actas espanolas de psiquiatria · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Desistance is a concept that has been poorly defined in the literature, yet greatly impacts the arguments for and against providing gender-affirming care for transgender and gender expansive (TGE) youth. This literature review aims to provide an overview of the literature on desistance and how desistance is defined. Methods: A systematically guided literature review was conducted on March 27, 2020, using CINAHL, Embase, LGBT Life, Medline, PsychINFO, and Web of Science to identify English language peer-reviewed studies, editorials, and theses that discuss desistance concerning TGE pre-pubertal youth for a minimum of three paragraphs. Articles were divided based on methodology and quantitative data were quality assessed and congregated. Definitions of desistance were compiled and analyzed using constant comparative method. Results: One qualitative study, 2 case studies, 5 quantitative studies, 5 ethical discussions, and 22 editorials were assessed. Quantitative studies were all poor quality, with 83% of 251 participants reported as desisting. Thirty definitions of desistance were found, with four overarching trends: desistance as the disappearance of gender dysphoria (GD) after puberty, a change in gender identity from TGE to cisgender, the disappearance of distress, and the disappearance of the desire for medical intervention. Conclusions: This review demonstrates the dearth of high-quality hypothesis-driven research that currently exists and suggests that desistance should no longer be used in clinical work or research. This transition can help future research move away from attempting to predict gender outcomes and instead focus on helping reduce distress from GD in TGE children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.