Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36642999›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2023

Effects of age and time since injury on traumatic brain injury blood biomarkers: a TRACK-TBI study.

Raquel C Gardner, Ava M Puccio, Frederick K Korley, Kevin K W Wang, Ramon Diaz-Arrastia, David O Okonkwo, Ross C Puffer, Esther L Yuh, John K Yue, Xiaoying Sun and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Blood-based biomarkers GFAP/UCH-L1 for the diagnosis of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI): a single-center implementation experience.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Raquel C GardnerDepartment of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Ava M PuccioDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Frederick K KorleyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Kevin K W WangDepartments of Emergency Medicine, Psychiatry, and Neuroscience, McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
Ramon Diaz-ArrastiaDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
David O OkonkwoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Ross C PufferDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Esther L YuhDepartment of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
John K YueDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Xiaoying SunHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA 92161, USA.
Sabrina R TaylorDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Pratik MukherjeeDepartment of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7473-7409
Sonia JainHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA 92161, USA.
Geoffrey T ManleyDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
TRACK-TBI Investigators
University of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · USUniversity of California San Diego · USSan Francisco VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Michigan · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Transforming Research And Clinical Knowledge in Geriatric Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-GERI)R01NS110944 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GARDNER, RAQUEL C., MANLEY, GEOFFREY T · 2019 to 2023
$3.4M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS110944
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Older adults have the highest incidence of traumatic brain injury globally. Accurate blood-based biomarkers are needed to assist with diagnosis of patients across the spectrum of age and time post-injury. Several reports have suggested lower accuracy for blood-based biomarkers in older adults, and there is a paucity of data beyond day-1 post-injury. Our aims were to investigate age-related differences in diagnostic accuracy and 2-week evolution of four leading candidate blood-based traumatic brain injury biomarkers-plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein, ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1, S100 calcium binding protein B and neuron-specific enolase-among participants in the 18-site prospective cohort study Transforming Research And Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury. Day-1 biomarker data were available for 2602 participants including 2151 patients with traumatic brain injury, 242 orthopedic trauma controls and 209 healthy controls. Participants were stratified into 3 age categories (young: 17-39 years, middle-aged: 40-64 years, older: 65-90 years). We investigated age-stratified biomarker levels and biomarker discriminative abilities across three diagnostic groups: head CT-positive/negative; traumatic brain injury/orthopedic controls; and traumatic brain injury/healthy controls. The difference in day-1 glial fibrillary acidic protein, ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 and neuron-specific enolase levels across most diagnostic groups was significantly smaller for older versus younger adults, resulting in a narrower range within which a traumatic brain injury diagnosis may be discriminated in older adults. Despite this, day-1 glial fibrillary acidic protein had good to excellent performance across all age-categories for discriminating all three diagnostic groups (area under the curve 0.84-0.96; lower limit of 95% confidence intervals all >0.78). Day-1 S100 calcium-binding protein B and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 showed good discrimination of CT-positive versus negative only among adults under age 40 years within 6 hours of injury. Longitudinal blood-based biomarker data were available for 522 hospitalized patients with traumatic brain injury and 24 hospitalized orthopaedic controls. Glial fibrillary acidic protein levels maintained good to excellent discrimination across diagnostic groups until day 3 post-injury irrespective of age, until day 5 post-injury among middle-aged or younger patients and until week 2 post-injury among young patients only. In conclusion, the blood-based glial fibrillary acidic protein assay tested here has good to excellent performance across all age-categories for discriminating key traumatic brain injury diagnostic groups to at least 3 days post-injury in this trauma centre cohort. The addition of a blood-based diagnostic to the evaluation of traumatic brain injury, including geriatric traumatic brain injury, has potential to streamline diagnosis.

Indexed as

agingbiomarkersdiagnostichead CTtraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID36642999
PMCPMC9832515
OpenAlexW4310482505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.