ArticleSkeletal radiology2023
Prevalence of accessory sacroiliac joint anatomy and associated clinical features.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Canine Sacroiliac Joint: 2. Common Surface Variants.Anatomia, histologia, embryologia · 2026Article
- Computed tomography-based assessment of sacroiliac joint variations: associations with sacral types, sex, and side.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2026Article
- Age-related prevalence of sacroiliac joint variations and their association with structural damage in axial spondyloarthritis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- When it is not sacroiliitis.Skeletal radiology · 2025Review
- Factors affecting postoperative pelvic incidence reduction following surgery for adult spinal deformity.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025Article
- The sacroiliac joint across ages - what is normal?Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe accessory sacroiliac joint (ASIJ) is the most common sacroiliac joint anatomical variant; however, its literature-reported prevalence is inconsistent. Previous CT-based studies of the ASIJ have used thick axial slices, which may not adequately detail ASIJ anatomy. The aims of this study are to (1) evaluate ASIJ prevalence and radiographic features in a large age- and sex-balanced cohort using thin-section CT and (2) determine associations between ASIJ anatomy, patient features, and treatment strategies. MATERIALS AND
methodsThin-section CTs (0.75 to 2.00 mm) of the pelvis from 800 patients were reviewed by two musculoskeletal radiologists. Degree of degenerative change and ankylosis at ASIJs were detailed. The EMR was used to capture demographics, lower back or sacroiliac joint symptoms, and treatments.
resultsThe ASIJ was present in 25.8% of patients and bilateral in 53.3% of those with any ASIJ. ASIJs were more common at the S2 than S1 neural foramen level (75.7% and 27.2%). There was a statistically significant difference between age and presence of any ASIJ anatomy (mean (SD) 69.0 (19.8) with ASIJ versus 55.9 (22.1) years without ASIJ). Degenerative changes and ankylosis were found in 93.5% and 20.3% of ASIJs, respectively. There was a higher odds ratio of having received a sacroiliac joint corticosteroid injection in those with ASIJ anatomy.
conclusionRadiologists should be familiar with the ASIJ and consider its age-related association, propensity to show ASIJ degenerative change, and ability to serve as a potential pain generator. Steroid injections may be considered for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.