Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36642766›Full record

Trial reportGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2023

Continuous voriconazole lavage in managing moderate and severe fungal keratitis: a randomized controlled trial.

Yujia Gong, Liwei Zhang, Shaohua Liu, Hongyan Zhang, Li Peng, Haoyu Li, Shirui Dai, Baihua Chen

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Emerging treatments in fungal keratitis.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yujia GongDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, China.
Liwei ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, China.
Shaohua LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, China.
Hongyan ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, China.
Li PengDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, China.
Haoyu LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, China.
Shirui DaiDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, China.
Baihua ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, 410011, China. chenbaihua2017@csu.edu.cn.
Hunan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNCentral South University · CNSecond Xiangya Hospital of Central South University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81870678National Natural Science Foundation of China 82171030Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province 2021JJ30925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the effectiveness and safety of continuous lavage with 1% voriconazole (CL) for moderate and severe fungal keratitis.

methodsThirty-one patients were randomized to receive topical eye drops either alone (T) or combined with continuous 1% voriconazole lavage (CL-T). The primary outcome was the cure rate at 3 months. The secondary outcomes were the 6-day efficacy, 3-day infiltration size and depth, hypopyon height, central corneal thickness (CCT), epithelial defect size, and subject feelings and clinical signs assessment scores.

resultsAt 3 months, the cure rate was comparable between the groups in patients with moderate fungal keratitis (66.7% vs. 62.5%, P = 0.60). However, among severe cases, 4 cases (44.4%) in the CL-T group healed successfully, while none in the T group; this difference was not significant (P = 0.08), although it was very close to 0.05. This may be related to the small sample size. After 6 days, the percentage of patients with "worsened" ulcers in the CL-T group was lower than that in the T group (0% vs. 31%, P = 0.043). The infiltration size, infiltration depth, and hypopyon height in the CL-T group were smaller than those in the T group after 3 days (all P < 0.05). There was no difference in CCT, epithelial defect size, subject feelings scores, or clinical signs scores between groups.

conclusionThese outcomes suggest that CL is an effective and safe adjuvant method for controlling the progression of moderate and severe fungal keratitis. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2100050565.

Indexed as

Corneal UlcerEye Infections, FungalKeratitisAntifungal AgentsHumansTherapeutic IrrigationVoriconazoleAntifungal AgentsVoriconazoleContinuous lavageEffectivenessFungal keratitisSafety

Identifiers

PMID36642766
OpenAlexW4316345216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.