Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36642762›Full record

ReviewCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2023

Clinical expert consensus document on rotational atherectomy from the Japanese association of cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics: update 2023.

Kenichi Sakakura, Yoshiaki Ito, Yoshisato Shibata, Atsunori Okamura, Yoshifumi Kashima, Shigeru Nakamura, Yuji Hamazaki, Junya Ako, Hiroyoshi Yokoi, Yoshio Kobayashi and 1 more

Full text readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Difference Between Low-Speed and High-Speed Rotational Atherectomy Using Two Types of Guidewires.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Article
  11. Impact of Burr Speed and Polishing Run Sequences on Rotational Atherectomy Efficacy In Vitro.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Comparative Analysis of Intravascular Lithotripsy With and Without Atherectomy in Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions Using OCT and OFDI.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kenichi SakakuraDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, 1-847 Amanuma, Omiya, Saitama, 330-8503, Japan. ksakakura@jichi.ac.jp.
Yoshiaki ItoDepartment of Cardiology, Saiseikai Yokohama City Eastern Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
Yoshisato ShibataDepartment of Cardiology, Miyazaki Medical Association Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan.
Atsunori OkamuraDivision of Cardiology, Sakurabashi Watanabe Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshifumi KashimaDivision of Interventional Cardiology, Sapporo Cardio Vascular Clinic, Sapporo Heart Center, Sapporo, Japan.
Shigeru NakamuraCardiovascular Center, Kyoto Katsura Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Yuji HamazakiDivision of Cardiology, Ootakanomori Hospital, Kashiwa, Japan.
Junya AkoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.
Hiroyoshi YokoiDepartment of Cardiology, Fukuoka Sanno Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan.
Yoshio KobayashiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan.
Yuji IkariDepartment of Cardiology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Task Force on Rotational Atherectomy of the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT) proposed the expert consensus document to summarize the techniques and evidences regarding rotational atherectomy (RA) in 2020. Because the revascularization strategy to severely calcified lesions is the hottest topic in contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), many evidences related to RA have been published since 2020. Latest advancements have been incorporated in this updated expert consensus document.

Indexed as

Atherectomy, CoronaryCoronary Artery DiseasePercutaneous Coronary InterventionVascular CalcificationConsensusEast Asian PeopleHumansTreatment OutcomeCalcificationIntravascular ultrasoundOptical coherence tomographyPercutaneous coronary interventionRotational atherectomy

Identifiers

PMID36642762
PMCPMC10020250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read18
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.