ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2023
Knowledge and attitude of reproductive-aged women towards planned oocyte cryopreservation in the United Arab Emirates.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Acceptance rates and reasons for social oocyte cryopreservation among women: systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Pooled it
- Social egg freezing among single females: Middle Eastern point of view.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Women's Awareness and Knowledge of Planned Oocyte Cryopreservation at Different Sociocultural Levels: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Obstetrics and gynecology international · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Utilization of Cryopreserved Oocytes in Patients With Poor Ovarian Response After Planned Oocyte Cryopreservation.JAMA network open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDelayed conception is associated with a decline in oocyte number and quality. Oocyte cryopreservation techniques are used for medical or non-medical (elective) reasons. We aim to assess the knowledge and attitudes towards planned oocyte cryopreservation (POC) among reproductive-aged women in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and to investigate the factors interfering with their decisions.
methodsA cross-sectional study on 422 women (18-38 years) living in the UAE, using an online questionnaire with three sections: sociodemographic, knowledge, and attitudes towards POC.
results91.2% of participants have heard of POC, 84.1% hold a bachelor's degree or higher, 65.4% with medical background, 54.3% employed, and 79.2% live in Sharjah and Dubai. Consideration of POC was significantly associated with age (p = 0.011), employment (p = 0.002), the Emirates they live (p < 0.001), and if they have heard of POC (p = 0.036). Mean knowledge score was 44.44%, which was significantly higher among those considering POC (49.66% vs. 40.55%), and social media was their main source of information. About 57% will not consider POC, mainly due to cost, cultural issues, and safety. Determinants of knowledge score were marital status (B = 0.44; 95%CI: 0.09-0.79; p value = 0.014) and education level (B = 0.35; 95%CI: 0.13-0.58; p value = 0.002), and after adjustment, only the education level remained significantly associated with knowledge score (B = 0.24; 95%CI: 0.01-0.47; p value = 0.042).
conclusionDespite many participants being motivated to undergo POC, majority had poor knowledge, and cost was the main barrier. The main determinant of the knowledge score was education level. Awareness among couples of consequences of delaying childbearing and comprehensive information from medical practitioners are highly needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.