Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36642221›Full record

ReviewBiomedical journal2023

Protein network analysis and functional enrichment via computational biotechnology unravel molecular and pathogenic mechanisms of kidney stone disease.

Paleerath Peerapen, Visith Thongboonkerd

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Role of UropathogenicPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paleerath PeerapenMedical Proteomics Unit, Research Department, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Visith ThongboonkerdMedical Proteomics Unit, Research Department, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. Electronic address: thongboonkerd@dr.com.
Siriraj Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mass spectrometry-based proteomics has been extensively applied to current biomedical research. From such large-scale identification of proteins, several computational tools have been developed for determining protein-protein interactions (PPI) network and functional significance of the identified proteins and their complex. Analyses of PPI network and functional enrichment have been widely applied to various fields of biomedical research. Herein, we summarize commonly used tools for PPI network analysis and functional enrichment in kidney stone research and discuss their applications to kidney stone disease (KSD). Such computational approach has been used mainly to investigate PPI networks and functional significance of the proteins derived from urine of patients with kidney stone (stone formers), stone matrix, Randall's plaque, renal papilla, renal tubular cells, mitochondria and immune cells. The data obtained from computational biotechnology leads to experimental validation and investigations that offer new knowledge on kidney stone formation processes. Moreover, the computational approach may also lead to defining new therapeutic targets and preventive strategies for better outcome in KSD management.

Indexed as

Calcium OxalateKidney CalculiBiotechnologyHumansKidneyKidney MedullaCalcium OxalateCalcium oxalateComputational approachCrystal receptorMechanismPreventionTherapeutic target

Identifiers

PMID36642221
PMCPMC10267970
OpenAlexW4315853558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.