ArticleFrontiers of optoelectronics2020
In vivo volumetric monitoring of revascularization of traumatized skin using extended depth-of-field photoacoustic microscopy.
Article in Frontiers of optoelectronics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- TT-PADM: A Time-Driven Transformer Diffusion Model for Robust Sparse-View and Limited-View Photoacoustic Tomography.BME frontiers · 2026Article
- Axially multifocal metalens for 3D volumetric photoacoustic imaging of neuromelanin in live brain organoid.Science advances · 2025Article
- Skin layer-specific spatiotemporal assessment of micrometabolism during wound angiogenesis.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Multiscale confocal photoacoustic dermoscopy to evaluate skin health.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Article
- Photoacoustic microscopy of vascular adaptation and tissue oxygen metabolism during cutaneous wound healing.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
- Photoacoustic monitoring of angiogenesis predicts response to therapy in healing wounds.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2022Article
- Tissue-mimicking phantoms for performance evaluation of photoacoustic microscopy systems.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
- Quantitative multilayered assessment of skin lightening by photoacoustic microscopy.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022Article
- Classification and discrimination of real and fake blood based on photoacoustic spectroscopy combined with particle swarm optimized wavelet neural networks.Photoacoustics · 2021Article
- Carbon-Coated Magnetic Nanoparticle Dedicated to MRI/Photoacoustic Imaging of Tumor in Living Mice.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
- Preface to the special issue on "Biomedical Optics".Frontiers of optoelectronics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Faster and better wound healing is a critical medical issue. Because the repair process of wounds is closely related to revascularization, accurate early assessment and postoperative monitoring are very important for establishing an optimal treatment plan. Herein, we present an extended depth-of-field photoacoustic microscopy system (E-DOF-PAM) that can achieve a constant spatial resolution and relatively uniform excitation efficiency over a long axial range. The superior performance of the system was verified by phantom and in vivo experiments. Furthermore, the system was applied to the imaging of normal and trauma sites of volunteers, and the experimental results accurately revealed the morphological differences between the normal and traumatized skin of the epidermis and dermis. These results demonstrated that the E-DOF-PAM is a powerful tool for observing and understanding the pathophysiology of cutaneous wound healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.