Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36641527›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

A multi-task convolutional neural network for classification and segmentation of chronic venous disorders.

Bruno Oliveira, Helena R Torres, Pedro Morais, Fernando Veloso, António L Baptista, Jaime C Fonseca, João L Vilaça

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. BucketAugment: Reinforced Domain Generalisation in Abdominal CT Segmentation.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bruno OliveiraLife and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal. boliveira@ipca.pt.
Helena R TorresLife and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal.
Pedro Morais2Ai - School of Technology, IPCA, Barcelos, Portugal.
Fernando VelosoLife and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal.
António L Baptista2Ai - School of Technology, IPCA, Barcelos, Portugal.
Jaime C FonsecaAlgoritmi Center, School of Engineering, University of Minho, Guimarães, Portugal.
João L Vilaça2Ai - School of Technology, IPCA, Barcelos, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic Venous Disorders (CVD) of the lower limbs are one of the most prevalent medical conditions, affecting 35% of adults in Europe and North America. Due to the exponential growth of the aging population and the worsening of CVD with age, it is expected that the healthcare costs and the resources needed for the treatment of CVD will increase in the coming years. The early diagnosis of CVD is fundamental in treatment planning, while the monitoring of its treatment is fundamental to assess a patient's condition and quantify the evolution of CVD. However, correct diagnosis relies on a qualitative approach through visual recognition of the various venous disorders, being time-consuming and highly dependent on the physician's expertise. In this paper, we propose a novel automatic strategy for the joint segmentation and classification of CVDs. The strategy relies on a multi-task deep learning network, denominated VENet, that simultaneously solves segmentation and classification tasks, exploiting the information of both tasks to increase learning efficiency, ultimately improving their performance. The proposed method was compared against state-of-the-art strategies in a dataset of 1376 CVD images. Experiments showed that the VENet achieved a classification performance of 96.4%, 96.4%, and 97.2% for accuracy, precision, and recall, respectively, and a segmentation performance of 75.4%, 76.7.0%, 76.7% for the Dice coefficient, precision, and recall, respectively. The joint formulation increased the robustness of both tasks when compared to the conventional classification or segmentation strategies, proving its added value, mainly for the segmentation of small lesions.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesNeural Networks, ComputerVeinsAgedChronic DiseaseEuropeHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNorth America

Identifiers

PMID36641527
PMCPMC9840616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.