Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36641518›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Fmr1-KO mice failure to detect object novelty associates with a post-test decrease of structural and synaptic plasticity upstream of the hippocampus.

Antonella Borreca, Mariassunta De Luca, Antonella Ferrante, Zaira Boussadia, Annabella Pignataro, Alberto Martire, Martine Ammassari-Teule

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Cage effects on synaptic plasticity and its modulation in a mouse model of fragile X syndrome.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Antonella Borreca *Institute of Neuroscience, CNR-National Research Council, Vedano Al Lambro, Milan, Italy.
Mariassunta De Luca *Institute of Neuroscience, CNR-National Research Council, Vedano Al Lambro, Milan, Italy.
Antonella FerranteNational Center for Drug Research and Evaluation, ISS-Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Zaira BoussadiaNational Center for Drug Research and Evaluation, ISS-Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Annabella PignataroEuropean Center for Brain Research, FSL-Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Alberto MartireNational Center for Drug Research and Evaluation, ISS-Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy. alberto.martire@iss.it.
Martine Ammassari-TeuleEuropean Center for Brain Research, FSL-Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy. martine.teule@cnr.it.
Istituto Superiore di Sanità · ITHumanitas University · ITEuropean Brain Research Institute · ITIstituto di Farmacologia Traslazionale · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mice with deletion of the FMR1 gene show episodic memory impairments and exhibit dendritic spines and synaptic plasticity defects prevalently identified in non-training conditions. Based on evidence that synaptic changes associated with normal or abnormal memory emerge when mice are cognitively challenged, here we examine whether, and how, fragile entorhinal and hippocampal synapses are remodeled when mice succeed or fail to learn. We trained Fmr1 knockout (KO) and wild-type C57BL/6J (WT) mice in the novel object recognition (NOR) paradigm with 1 h or 24 h training-to-test intervals and then assessed whether varying the time between the presentation of similar and different objects modulates NOR performance and plasticity along the entorhinal cortex-hippocampus axis. At the 1 h-interval, KO mice failed to discriminate the novel object, showed a collapse of spines in the lateral entorhinal cortex (LEC), and of long-term potentiation (LTP) in the lateral perforant path (LPP), but a normal increase in hippocampal spines. At the 24 h, they exhibited intact NOR performance, typical LEC and hippocampal spines, and exaggerated LPP-LTP. Our findings reveal that the inability of mice to detect object novelty primarily stands in their impediment to elaborate, and convey to the hippocampus, sensory/perceptive object representations.

Indexed as

HippocampusNeuronal PlasticityAnimalsFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1Long-Term PotentiationMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutSynapsesFmr1 protein, mouseFragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1

Identifiers

PMID36641518
PMCPMC9840621
OpenAlexW4316096799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.