Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36641494›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2023

An update on CRISPR-Cas12 as a versatile tool in genome editing.

Raghul Senthilnathan, Ilamathi Ilangovan, Milind Kunale, Nalini Easwaran, Siva Ramamoorthy, Ashokkumar Veeramuthu, Gothandam Kodiveri Muthukaliannan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. CRISPR-Cas System: A New Dawn to Combat Antibiotic Resistance.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Emerging Gene Therapeutics for Epidermolysis Bullosa under Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Raghul SenthilnathanSchool of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, 632 014, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0779-809X
Ilamathi IlangovanSchool of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, 632 014, India.
Milind KunaleSchool of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, 632 014, India.
Nalini EaswaranSchool of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, 632 014, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2513-1210
Siva RamamoorthySchool of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, 632 014, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7509-8602
Ashokkumar VeeramuthuCenter of Excellence in Catalysis for Bioenergy and Renewable Chemicals (CBRC), Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1973-033X
Gothandam Kodiveri MuthukaliannanSchool of Bio Sciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, 632 014, India. gothandam@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1576-5324

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene editing techniques, which help in modification of any DNA sequence at ease, have revolutionized the world of Genetic engineering. Although there are other gene-editing techniques, CRISPR has emerged as the chief and most preferred tool due to its simplicity and capacity to execute effective gene editing in a wide range of organisms. Although Cas9 has widely been employed for genetic modification over the years, Cas12 systems have lately emerged as a viable option. This review primarily focuses on assessing Cas12-mediated mutagenesis and elucidating the editing efficacy of both Cpf1 (Cas12a) and C2c1 (Cas12b) systems in microbes, plants, and other species. Also, we reviewed several genetic alterations that have been performed with these Cas12 systems to improve editing efficiency. Furthermore, the experimental benefits and applications of Cas12 systems are highlighted in this study.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene EditingGenetic EngineeringMutagenesisMutationC2c1Cpf1CRISPR Cas12 systemGene manipulationgRNATransformationVector

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.