Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36641465›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2023

A framework to improve quality of hospital-based physiotherapy: a design-based research study.

Rudi A Steenbruggen, Marjo J M Maas, Thomas J Hoogeboom, Paul L P Brand, Philip J van der Wees

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06647316 (The Effect of a Physioterapy Program on the Emotional Well-being of Patiens Admitted to an Acute Hospitalization Unit), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06647316 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of a Physioterapy Program on the Emotional Well-being of Patiens Admitted to an Acute Hospitalization Unit

TypeinterventionalSponsorSierra Varona SLRan2024 to 2025Enrolled101ConditionsAcute IllnessArmsPhysiotherapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rudi A SteenbruggenSchool of Health, Physiotherapy, Saxion University of Applied Sciences, Enschede, the Netherlands, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands, p/a Saxion, University of Applied Sciences, Postbus 70.000, 7500, KB, Enschede, the Netherlands. r.a.steenbruggen@saxion.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9531-910X
Marjo J M MaasInstitute of Allied Health Studies, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Nijmegen, the Netherlands Nijmegen, the Netherlands, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Thomas J HoogeboomRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Paul L P BrandIsala Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands, University of Groningen and University Medical Centre, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Philip J van der WeesRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA quality framework for hospital-based physiotherapy is lacking. This study aims to design a framework, building on the currently available literature, to improve the quality of hospital-based physiotherapy.

methodsA multidisciplinary panel of six representatives of hospital-based physiotherapy and their key stakeholders (patients, medical specialists, hospital management and professional association) was set up. We used brainwriting to sample ideas and the 'decision-matrix' to select the best ideas.

resultsThe first round of brainwriting with an online panel of six experienced participants yielded consensus on seven possible methods for quality improvement of hospital-based physiotherapy [1]: continuing education [2] ,feedback on patient reported experience measures and patient reported outcome measures [3] ,a quality portfolio [4] ,peer observation and feedback [5] ,360 degree feedback [6] ,a management information system, and [7] intervision with intercollegiate evaluation. Placing these methods in a decision matrix against four criteria (measurability, acceptability, impact, accessibility) resulted in a slight preference for a management information system, with almost equal preference for five other methods immediately thereafter. The least preference was given to a 360-degree feedback.

conclusionsIn the design of a framework for improving the quality of hospital-based physiotherapy, all seven suggested methods were perceived as relevant but differed in terms of advantages and disadvantages. This suggests that, within the framework, a mixture of these methods may be desirable to even out respective advantages and disadvantages.

Indexed as

MedicinePhysical Therapy ModalitiesEducation, ContinuingHospitalsHumansQuality ImprovementDesign-based researchHospitalPhysiotherapyQualityQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID36641465
PMCPMC9840522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.