Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36641457›Full record

ArticleTrials2023

Knowledge mobilization activities to support decision-making by youth, parents, and adults using a systematic and living map of evidence and recommendations on COVID-19: protocol for three randomized controlled trials and qualitative user-experience studies.

Rana Charide, Lisa Stallwood, Matthew Munan, Shahab Sayfi, Lisa Hartling, Nancy J Butcher, Martin Offringa, Sarah Elliott, Dawn P Richards, Joseph L Mathew and 15 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05358990 nacompletednot on this map

Knowledge Mobilization Activities to Support Decision-making by Youth, Parents and Adults Using a Systematic and Living Map of Evidence and Recommendations on Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled997ConditionsCOVID-19ArmsPlain Language Recommendation (PLR), Standard Language Version (SLV)
NCT07666399 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating Artificial Intelligence for Language Translation of Health-related Knowledge Mobilization Resources: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Qualitative Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AlbertaRan2026 to 2027Enrolled576ConditionsCommunication ResearchArmsKM Resource - English, KM Resource - Professionally Translated, KM Resouce - AI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Rana CharideMichael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and McMaster GRADE Centres, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Lisa StallwoodChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Matthew MunanAlberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Shahab SayfiSchulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Lisa HartlingAlberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Nancy J ButcherChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Martin OffringaChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sarah ElliottAlberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Dawn P RichardsFive02 Labs Inc, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Joseph L MathewPostgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Elie A AklMichael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and McMaster GRADE Centres, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Tamara KredoCochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa.
Lawrence MbuagbawMichael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and McMaster GRADE Centres, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Ashley MotillalMichael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and McMaster GRADE Centres, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Ami BabaChild Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Matthew PrebegCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jacqueline RelihanCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Shannon D ScottFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Jozef SuvadaDepartments of Science and International Studies, St. Elizabeth University of Public Health and Social Science, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
Maicon FalavignaNational Institute for Health Technology Assessment, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Miloslav KlugarCzech National Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Knowledge Translation (Cochrane Czech Republic, Czech EBHC: JBI Centre of Excellence, Masaryk University GRADE Centre), Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
Tamara LotfiMichael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and McMaster GRADE Centres, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Adrienne StevensCentre for Immunization Readiness, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
Kevin PottieSchulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Holger J SchünemannMichael G. DeGroote Cochrane Canada and McMaster GRADE Centres, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada. schuneh@mcmaster.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3211-8479

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) GA3-177732
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe COVID-19 pandemic underlined that guidelines and recommendations must be made more accessible and more understandable to the general public to improve health outcomes. The objective of this study is to evaluate, quantify, and compare the public's understanding, usability, satisfaction, intention to implement, and preference for different ways of presenting COVID-19 health recommendations derived from the COVID-19 Living Map of Recommendations and Gateway to Contextualization (RecMap). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a protocol for a multi-method study. Through an online survey, we will conduct pragmatic allocation-concealed, blinded superiority randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in three populations to test alternative formats of presenting health recommendations: adults, parents, and youth, with at least 240 participants in each population. Prior to initiating the RCT, our interventions will have been refined with relevant stakeholder input. The intervention arm will receive a plain language recommendation (PLR) format while the control arm will receive the corresponding original recommendation format as originally published by the guideline organizations (standard language version). Our primary outcome is understanding, and our secondary outcomes are accessibility and usability, satisfaction, intended behavior, and preference for the recommendation formats. Each population's results will be analyzed separately. However, we are planning a meta-analysis of the results across populations. At the end of each survey, participants will be invited to participate in an optional one-on-one, virtual semi-structured interview to explore their user experience. All interviews will be transcribed and analyzed using the principles of thematic analysis and a hybrid inductive and deductive approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Through Clinical Trials Ontario, the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board has reviewed and approved this protocol (Project ID: 3856). The University of Alberta has approved the parent portion of the trial (Project ID:00114894). Findings from this study will be disseminated through open-access publications in peer-reviewed journals and using social media.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT05358990 . Registered on May 3, 2022.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdolescentAdultHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicOntarioRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19eCOVID RecMapKnowledge mobilizationPlain language recommendationPublic engagementRandomized controlled trialStandard language versions

Identifiers

PMID36641457
PMCPMC9840541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.