Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36641099›Full record

ArticleContraception2023

U.S. physicians' perspectives on the complexities and challenges of permanent contraception provision.

Elizabeth A Mosley, Alexandra Monaco, Nikki Zite, Elian Rosenfeld, Jennifer Schablik, Niyati Rangnekar, Megan Hamm, Sonya Borrero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Postpartum Sterilization after a Preterm Delivery Is Not Associated with Decision Regret.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Development ofPEC innovation · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Uncertainty in Postpartum Permanent Contraception Decision-Making: Physician and Patient Perspectives.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Elizabeth A MosleyUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States; Center for Innovative Research on Gender Health Equity (CONVERGE), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States. Electronic address: Eam241@pitt.edu.
Alexandra MonacoUniversity of Florida College of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in Gainesville, FL.
Nikki ZiteUniversity of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine.
Elian RosenfeldCenter for Innovative Research on Gender Health Equity (CONVERGE), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Jennifer SchablikUniversity of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, TN, United States.
Niyati RangnekarUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center in Memphis, TN.
Megan HammUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States; Center for Innovative Research on Gender Health Equity (CONVERGE), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Sonya BorreroUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States; Center for Innovative Research on Gender Health Equity (CONVERGE), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.

Funding

Developing and testing a decision support tool for women making tubal sterilization decisions.R01MD011678 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BORRERO, SONYA B., MOSLEY, ELIZABETH ANN · 2017 to 2021
$3.4M
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD011678
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEvidence shows many misconceptions exist around permanent contraception, and there are numerous barriers to accessing the procedure. This qualitative study explored physician perspectives regarding patients' informational and decision-support needs, the complexities and challenges of counseling and access, and how these factors may differ for people living on lower incomes. STUDY

designWe conducted 15 semistructured, telephone interviews with obstetrician-gynecologists in three geographic regions of the United States to explore their perspectives on providing permanent contraception counseling and care. We analyzed the interviews using content analysis.

resultsPhysicians discussed a tension between respecting individual reproductive autonomy and concern for future regret; they wanted to support patients' desire for permanent contraception but were frequently concerned patients did not have the information they needed or the foresight to make high-quality decisions. Physicians also identified barriers to counseling including lack of time, lack of continuity over the course of prenatal care, and baseline misinformation among patients. Physicians identified additional barriers in providing a postpartum procedure even after thedecision was made including lack of personnel and operating room availability. Finally, physicians felt that people living on lower incomes faced more challenges in access primarily due to the sterilization consent regulations required by Medicaid.

conclusionsPhysicians report numerous challenges surrounding permanent contraception provision and access. Strategies are needed to support physicians and patients to enhance high-quality, patient-centered sterilization decision making and ensure that patients are able to access a permanent contraceptive procedure when desired. IMPLICATIONS: This qualitative study demonstrates the various challenges faced by physicians to support permanent contraception decision making. These challenges may limit patients' access to the care they desire. This study supports the need to transform care delivery models and improve the federal sterilization policy to ensure equitable patient-centered access to desired permanent contraception. DISCLAIMER: Although the term permanent contraception has increasingly replaced the word sterilization in clinical settings, we use sterilization in some places throughout this paper as that was the standard terminology at the time the interviews were conducted and the language the interviewed physicians used.

Indexed as

ContraceptionPhysiciansContraceptive AgentsFemaleHumansPostpartum PeriodPregnancySterilization, ReproductiveUnited StatesContraceptive AgentsBarriersCounselingLow-incomeMedicaidPermanent contraceptionSterilization

Identifiers

PMID36641099
PMCPMC10159903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.