ArticleContraception2023
U.S. physicians' perspectives on the complexities and challenges of permanent contraception provision.
Article in Contraception, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Decision Aid to Support Tubal Sterilization Decision-Making Among Pregnant Women: The MyDecision/MiDecisión Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- Article
- Multiplatform characterization of online permanent female contraception discussion among social media users: analysis of Twitter and Reddit.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- Contraceptive care and method use by sexual and gender minority status: insights from a longitudinal panel of sexual and reproductive healthcare patients in Wisconsin.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2025Article
- Postpartum Sterilization after a Preterm Delivery Is Not Associated with Decision Regret.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2025Article
- Association Between Comorbidities and Inpatient Postpartum Permanent Contraception Completion.Obstetrics and gynecology · 2025Article
- Patient Perspectives on Clinician Support When Pursuing Permanent Contraception in the United States.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2025Article
- Fulfillment of Permanent Contraception among Patients with Cesarean Delivery in a Multi-Site Cohort.Maternal and child health journal · 2024Article
- Documentation of prenatal contraceptive counseling and fulfillment of permanent contraception: a retrospective cohort study.Reproductive health · 2024Article
- Development ofPEC innovation · 2023Article
- Reproductive justice in post-Roe America: Impact of restricted abortion access on patients seeking permanent contraception.Contraception · 2023Article
- Uncertainty in Postpartum Permanent Contraception Decision-Making: Physician and Patient Perspectives.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's HealthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesEvidence shows many misconceptions exist around permanent contraception, and there are numerous barriers to accessing the procedure. This qualitative study explored physician perspectives regarding patients' informational and decision-support needs, the complexities and challenges of counseling and access, and how these factors may differ for people living on lower incomes. STUDY
designWe conducted 15 semistructured, telephone interviews with obstetrician-gynecologists in three geographic regions of the United States to explore their perspectives on providing permanent contraception counseling and care. We analyzed the interviews using content analysis.
resultsPhysicians discussed a tension between respecting individual reproductive autonomy and concern for future regret; they wanted to support patients' desire for permanent contraception but were frequently concerned patients did not have the information they needed or the foresight to make high-quality decisions. Physicians also identified barriers to counseling including lack of time, lack of continuity over the course of prenatal care, and baseline misinformation among patients. Physicians identified additional barriers in providing a postpartum procedure even after thedecision was made including lack of personnel and operating room availability. Finally, physicians felt that people living on lower incomes faced more challenges in access primarily due to the sterilization consent regulations required by Medicaid.
conclusionsPhysicians report numerous challenges surrounding permanent contraception provision and access. Strategies are needed to support physicians and patients to enhance high-quality, patient-centered sterilization decision making and ensure that patients are able to access a permanent contraceptive procedure when desired. IMPLICATIONS: This qualitative study demonstrates the various challenges faced by physicians to support permanent contraception decision making. These challenges may limit patients' access to the care they desire. This study supports the need to transform care delivery models and improve the federal sterilization policy to ensure equitable patient-centered access to desired permanent contraception. DISCLAIMER: Although the term permanent contraception has increasingly replaced the word sterilization in clinical settings, we use sterilization in some places throughout this paper as that was the standard terminology at the time the interviews were conducted and the language the interviewed physicians used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.