ArticleIndian heart journal
The relation between pericoronary fat thickness and density quantified by coronary computed tomography angiography with coronary artery disease severity.
Article in Indian heart journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A new insight on imaging characteristics of pericoronary adipose tissue for cardiovascular risk.Cardiovascular ultrasound · 2026Review
- Predictive Value of CT Fractional Flow Reserve and Fat Attenuation Index Derived from Coronary CT Angiography for In-Stent Restenosis After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2025Article
- Epicardial fat density obtained with computed tomography imaging - more important than volume?Cardiovascular diabetology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo study the correlation between epicardial fat thickness (EFT), pericoronary fat thickness (PCFT), and pericoronary fat density (PCFD) with the existence and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD).
methodsThis cross-sectional study included 210 patients referred for multislice CT angiography. Group I normal CTCA, Group II patients had non-obstructive atherosclerosis, and Group III patients had obstructive atherosclerosis. All patients underwent a clinical examination, history taking, and multislice CT angiography.
resultsThe mean EFT was significantly greater in group III (10.43 ± 2.31 mm) compared to groups II (6.30 ± 1.61 mm) and I (5.06 ± 1.14 mm). The mean PCFT was significantly greater in group III (17.96 ± 2.89 mm) compared to group II (11.47 ± 2.51 mm) and group I (9.67 ± 1.99 mm). PCFD was significantly higher adjacent to the lesion (-80.47 ± 29.14) compared to the normal segment (-109.03 ± 35.24), higher in the obstructive group (-59.44 ± 20.10) compared to the non-obstructive group (-101.51 ± 20.23), but lower in calcified lesions (-89.58 ± 28.94) compared to non-calcified (-75.01 ± 29.20), and mixed lesions (-74.83 ± 26.90). EFT and PCFT cut-off values for predicting obstructive CAD were 8.3 and 12.4 mm, respectively, with 87.1% and 92.9% sensitivity and 92.9% and 86.4% specificity, respectively.
conclusionThere is a significant association between epicardial fat thickness, pericoronary fat thickness and density with the severity of coronary artery disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.