Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36640794›Full record

Trial reportThe lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology2023

Withdrawal of infliximab or concomitant immunosuppressant therapy in patients with Crohn's disease on combination therapy (SPARE): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Edouard Louis, Matthieu Resche-Rigon, David Laharie, Jack Satsangi, Nik Ding, Britta Siegmund, Geert D'Haens, Laurence Picon, Peter Bossuyt, Lucine Vuitton and 14 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02177071 (A proSpective Randomized Controlled Trial comParing infliximAb-antimetabolites Combination Therapy to Anti-metabolites monotheRapy and Infliximab monothErapy in Crohn's Disease Patients in Sustained Steroid-free Remission on Combination Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
31.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02177071 phase4completednot on this map

A proSpective Randomized Controlled Trial comParing infliximAb-antimetabolites Combination Therapy to Anti-metabolites monotheRapy and Infliximab monothErapy in Crohn's Disease Patients in Sustained Steroid-free Remission on Combination Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorGroupe d'Etude Therapeutique des Affections Inflammatoires DigestivesRan2015 to 2021Enrolled211ConditionsCrohn's DiseaseArmsINFLIXIMAB, AZATHIOPRINE, MERCAPTOPURINE, Methotrexate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The GETAID: over 40 years of academic research in IBD.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Understanding the therapeutic toolkit for inflammatory bowel disease.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 20 institutions in 10 countries.

Edouard LouisDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital CHU of Liège, Liège, Belgium. Electronic address: edouard.louis@uliege.be.
Matthieu Resche-RigonUniversité de Paris, ECSTRRA - CRESS UMR1153, INSERM and SBIM, AP-HP, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France.
David LaharieService d'Hépato-gastroentérologie et oncologie digestive CHU de Bordeaux, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque- Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Jack SatsangiTranslational Gastroenterology Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Nik DingDepartment of Gastroenterology, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Britta SiegmundMedical Department, Division of Gastroenterology, Infectious Diseases and Rheumatology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.
Geert D'HaensDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Laurence PiconHépato-Gastro-Onco-Entérologie, Hôpital Trousseau, Tours, France.
Peter BossuytImelda GI Clinical Research Center, Imelda General Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium.
Lucine VuittonDepartment of Gastroenterology, Besançon Univeristy Hospital, Besançon, France; UMR 1098, Franche-Comté University, Besançon, France.
Peter IrvingIBD Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Stephanie ViennotDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Caen, Caen, France.
Christopher A LambTranslational & Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Department of Gastroenterology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Richard PollokGastroenterology, St Georges University Hospital, London, UK.
Filip BaertAZ Delta Hospital, Roeselare, Belgium.
Maria NachuryU1286 - INFINITE - Institute for Translational Research in Inflammation, University of Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, Lille, France.
Mathurin FumeryDepartment of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Amiens, Amiens, France; Peritox, University of Picardie, Amiens, France.
Cyrielle GillettaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Pancreatology, University Hospital of Toulouse Rangueil, Toulouse, France.
Sven AlmerIBD-unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Karolinska University hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Shomron Ben-HorinDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.
Yoram BouhnikDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beaujon Hospital, APHP, Paris Cité University, Clichy, France.
Jean-Frederic ColombelDepartment of Gastroenterology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Erik HertervigDepartment of Gastroenterology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
GETAID and the SPARE-Biocycle research group
Inserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen Normandie · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse · FRDelta Air Lines (United States) · USGetinge (Sweden) · SEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USImelda Hospital · BEJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBKarolinska University Hospital · SEKing's College London · GBNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBSheba Medical Center · ILSorbonne Université · FRSt. George's University · GDThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversité de Bordeaux · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe combination of infliximab and immunosuppressant therapy is a standard management strategy for patients with Crohn's disease. Concerns regarding the implications of long-term combination therapy provided the rationale for a formal clinical trial of treatment de-escalation. Our aim was to compare the relapse rate and the time spent in remission over 2 years between patients continuing combination therapy and those stopping infliximab or immunosuppressant therapy.

methodsThis multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial was performed in 64 hospitals in seven countries in Europe and Australia. Adult patients with Crohn's disease in steroid-free clinical remission for more than 6 months, on combination therapy of infliximab and immunosuppressant therapy for at least 8 months were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to either continue combination therapy (combination group), discontinue infliximab (infliximab withdrawal group), or discontinue immunosuppressant therapy (immunosuppressant withdrawal group). Randomisation was stratified according to disease duration before start of first anti-TNF treatment (≤2 or >2 years), failure of immunosuppressant therapy before start of infliximab, and presence of ulcers at baseline endoscopy. The patient number and group of each stratum were assigned by a central online randomisation website. Treatment was optimised or resumed in case of relapse in all groups. Participants, those assessing outcomes, and those analysing the data were not masked to group assignment. The coprimary endpoints were the relapse rate (superiority analysis) and time in remission over 2 years (non-inferiority analysis, non-inferiority margin 35 days). Analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02177071, and with EU Clinical Trials Register, EUDRACT 2014-002311-41. The trial was completed in April, 2021.

findingsBetween Nov 2, 2015, and April 24, 2019, 254 patients were screened. Of these, 211 were randomised and 207 were included in the final analysis (n=67 in the combination group, n=71 in the infliximab withdrawal group, and n=69 in the immunosuppressant withdrawal group). 39 patients had a relapse (eight [12%] of 67 in the combination group, 25 [35%] of 71 in the infliximab withdrawal group, six [9%] of 69 in the immunosuppressant withdrawal group). 2-year relapse rates were 14% (95% CI 4-23) in the combination group, 36% (24-47) in the infliximab withdrawal group, and 10% (2-18) in the immunosuppressant withdrawal group (hazard ratio [HR] 3·45 [95% CI 1·56-7·69], p=0·003, for infliximab withdrawal vs combination, and 4·76 [1·92-11·11], p=0·0004, for infliximab withdrawal vs immunosuppressant withdrawal). Of 28 patients who had a relapse and were retreated or optimised according to protocol, remission was achieved in 25 patients (one of two in the combination group, 22 of 23 in the infliximab withdrawal group, and two of three in the immunosuppressant withdrawal group). The mean time spent in remission over 2 years was 698 days (95% CI 668-727) in the combination group, 684 days (651-717) in the infliximab withdrawal group, and 706 days (682-730) in the immunosuppressant withdrawal group. The difference in restricted mean survival time in remission was -14 days (95% CI -56 to 27) between the infliximab withdrawal group and the combination group and -22 days (-62 to 16) between the infliximab withdrawal group and the immunosuppressant withdrawal group. The 95% CIs contained the non-inferiority threshold (-35 days). We recorded 31 serious adverse events, in 20 patients, with no difference in frequency between groups. The most frequent serious adverse events were infections (four in the combination group, two in the infliximab withdrawal group, and one in the immunosuppressant withdrawal group) and Crohn's disease exacerbation (three in the combination group, four in the infliximab withdrawal group, and one in the immunosuppressant withdrawal group). No death nor malignancy was recorded.

interpretationIn patients with Crohn's disease in sustained steroid-free remission under combination therapy with infliximab and immunosuppressant therapy, withdrawal of infliximab should only be considered after careful assessment of risks and benefits for each patient, whereas withdrawal of immunosuppressant therapy could generally represent a preferable strategy when considering treatment de-escalation.

fundingEuropean Union's Horizon 2020.

Indexed as

Crohn DiseaseImmunosuppressive AgentsAdultAzathioprineHumansInfliximabRecurrenceTumor Necrosis Factor InhibitorsAzathioprineImmunosuppressive AgentsInfliximabTumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID36640794
PMCPMC9908559
OpenAlexW4315607295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.