Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36640786›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Respiratory medicine2023

Comparative outcomes of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for COVID-19 delivered in experienced European centres during successive SARS-CoV-2 variant outbreaks (ECMO-SURGES): an international, multicentre, retrospective cohort study.

Matthieu Schmidt, David Hajage, Micha Landoll, Benjamin Pequignot, Elise Langouet, Matthieu Amalric, Armand Mekontso-Dessap, Luis Chiscano-Camon, Katy Surman, Dylan Finnerty and 24 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Respiratory medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors.

Matthieu SchmidtINSERM, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France; Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, AP-HP Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
David HajageSorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Département de Santé Publique, Centre de Pharmacoépidémiologie (Cephepi), Paris, France.
Micha LandollARDS and ECMO Centre Cologne-Merheim, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany; Department of Cardiovascular Engineering, Institute of Applied Medical Engineering, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Benjamin PequignotUniversité de Lorraine, CHRU de Nancy, Institut Lorrain du Cœur et des Vaisseaux, Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, U1116, FCRIN-INICRCT, Nancy, France.
Elise LangouetService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, AP-HP Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Matthieu AmalricService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU Hôpital Nord, AP-HM, Marseille, France.
Armand Mekontso-DessapService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri-Mondor, AP-HP, Créteil, France.
Luis Chiscano-CamonDepartment of Intensive Care, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; SODIR, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Barcelona, Spain.
Katy SurmanIntensive Care, Division of Surgery, Transplant and Anaesthetics, Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Dylan FinnertyIntensive Care, Division of Surgery, Transplant and Anaesthetics, Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Patricia Santa-TeresaDepartment of Intensive Care, Hospital Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Antonio ArcadipaneDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS-ISMETT (Istituto Mediterraneo per I Trapianti e Terapia ad alta specializzazione), Palermo, Italy.
Pablo MillánDepartment of Intensive Care, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
Roberto Roncon-AlbuquerqueDepartment of Intensive Care, São João Universitary Hospital Centre, Porto, Portugal.
Aaron Blandino-OrtizDepartment of Intensive Care, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.
Pablo Blanco-SchweizerDepartment of Intensive Care Hospital Universitario Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain.
Pilar RicartDepartment of Intensive Care Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona - Barcelona, Spain.
Ricardo Gimeno-CostaDepartment of Intensive Care, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, València, Spain.
Carlos Luis AlbaceteDepartment of Intensive Care, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, Spain.
Philip FortunaMedical Emergency Unit, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal.
Peter SchellongowskiDepartment of Medicine I, Intensive Care Unit 13i2, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Centre of Excellence in Medical Intensive Care (CEMIC), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Dieter DauweDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Hadrien WiniszewskiMedical Intensive Care Unit, Besançon University Hospital, Besançon, France; Research Unit EA 3920, University of Franche-Comté, Besançon, France.
Antoine KimmounUniversité de Lorraine, CHRU de Nancy, Institut Lorrain du Cœur et des Vaisseaux, Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, U1116, FCRIN-INICRCT, Nancy, France.
Bruno LevyUniversité de Lorraine, CHRU de Nancy, Institut Lorrain du Cœur et des Vaisseaux, Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, U1116, FCRIN-INICRCT, Nancy, France.
Greet HermansMedical Intensive Care Unit, Department of General Internal Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Belgium.
Giacomo GrasselliDipartimento di Anestesia, Rianimazione ed Emergenza, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Dipartimento di Fisiopatologia Medico-Chirurgica e dei Trapianti, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Guillaume LebretonINSERM, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France; Service de Chirurgie Cardiaque, Institut de Cardiologie, APHP Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Christophe GuervillyService de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU Hôpital Nord, AP-HM, Marseille, France; CEReSS - Centre for Studies and Research on Health Services and Quality of Life EA3279, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Genarro MartucciDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS-ISMETT (Istituto Mediterraneo per I Trapianti e Terapia ad alta specializzazione), Palermo, Italy.
Christian KaragiannidisARDS and ECMO Centre Cologne-Merheim, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany; Department of Cardiovascular Engineering, Institute of Applied Medical Engineering, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Jordi RieraSODIR, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Barcelona, Spain.
Alain CombesINSERM, UMRS_1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France; Service de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, AP-HP Sorbonne Université Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France. Electronic address: alain.combes@aphp.fr.
ECMO-SURGES Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo inform future research and practice, we aimed to investigate the outcomes of patients who received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to different variants of SARS-CoV-2.

methodsThis retrospective study included consecutive adult patients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection who received ECMO for ARDS in 21 experienced ECMO centres in eight European countries (Austria, Belgium, England, France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, and Spain) between Jan 1, 2020, and Sept 30, 2021. We collected data on patient characteristics, clinical status, and management before and after the initiation of ECMO. Participants were grouped according to SARS-CoV-2 variant (wild type, alpha, delta, or other) and period of the pandemic (first [Jan 1-June 30] and second [July 1-Dec 31] semesters of 2020, and first [Jan 1-June 30] and second [July 1-Sept 30] semesters of 2021). Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to analyse evolving characteristics, management, and patient outcomes over the first 2 years of the pandemic, and independent risk factors of mortality were determined using multivariable Cox regression models. The primary outcome was mortality 90 days after the initiation of ECMO, with follow-up to Dec 30, 2021.

findingsECMO was initiated in 1345 patients. Patient characteristics and management were similar for the groups of patients infected with different variants, except that those with the delta variant had a younger median age and less hypertension and diabetes. 90-day mortality was 42% (569 of 1345 patients died) overall, and 43% (297/686) in patients infected with wild-type SARS-CoV-2, 39% (152/391) in those with the alpha variant, 40% (78/195) in those with the delta variant, and 58% (42/73) in patients infected with other variants (mainly beta and gamma). Mortality was 10% higher (50%) in the second semester of 2020, when the wild-type variant was still prevailing, than in other semesters (40%). Independent predictors of mortality were age, immunocompromised status, a longer time from intensive care unit admission to intubation, need for renal replacement therapy, and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment haemodynamic component score, partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide, and lactate concentration before ECMO. After adjusting for these variables, mortality was significantly higher with the delta variant than with the other variants, the wild-type strain being the reference.

interpretationAlthough crude mortality did not differ between variants, adjusted risk of death was highest for patients treated with ECMO infected with the delta variant of SARS-CoV-2. The higher virulence and poorer outcomes associated with the delta strain might relate to higher viral load and increased inflammatory response syndrome in infected patients, reinforcing the need for a higher rate of vaccination in the population and updated selection criteria for ECMO, should a new and highly virulent strain of SARS-CoV-2 emerge in the future. Mortality was noticeably lower than in other large, multicentre series of patients who received ECMO for COVID-19, highlighting the need to concentrate resources at experienced centres.

fundingNone.

Indexed as

COVID-19Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationRespiratory Distress SyndromeAdultHumansPandemicsRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36640786
PMCPMC9889098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.