Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36640173›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

Validation of a semi-automatic method to measure total liver volumes in polycystic liver disease on computed tomography - high speed and accuracy.

Sophie E Aapkes, Thijs R M Barten, Walter Coudyzer, Joost P H Drenth, Ivo M A Geijselaers, Sterre A M Ter Grote, Ron T Gansevoort, Frederik Nevens, Maatje D A van Gastel

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Sophie E AapkesDepartment Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Thijs R M BartenEuropean Reference Center RARE-LIVER, Hamburg, Germany.
Walter CoudyzerDepartment Radiology, Universiteitsziekenhuis Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Joost P H DrenthEuropean Reference Center RARE-LIVER, Hamburg, Germany.
Ivo M A GeijselaersDepartment Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Sterre A M Ter GroteDepartment Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ron T GansevoortDepartment Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Frederik NevensEuropean Reference Center RARE-LIVER, Hamburg, Germany.
Maatje D A van GastelDepartment Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands. m.d.a.van.gastel@umcg.nl.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLEuropean X-Ray Free-Electron Laser · DEUniversitair Ziekenhuis Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPolycystic liver disease (PLD) is characterized by growth of hepatic cysts, causing hepatomegaly. Disease severity is determined using total liver volume (TLV), which can be measured from computed tomography (CT). The gold standard is manual segmentation which is time-consuming and requires expert knowledge of the anatomy. This study aims to validate the commercially available semi-automatic MMWP (Multimodality Workplace) Volume tool for CT scans of PLD patients.

methodsWe included adult patients with one (n = 60) or two (n = 46) abdominal CT scans. Semi-automatic contouring was compared with manual segmentation, using comparison of observed volumes (cross-sectional) and growth (longitudinal), correlation coefficients (CC), and Bland-Altman analyses with bias and precision, defined as the mean difference and SD from this difference. Inter- and intra-reader variability were assessed using coefficients of variation (CV) and we assessed the time to perform both procedures.

resultsMedian TLV was 5292.2 mL (IQR 3141.4-7862.2 mL) at baseline. Cross-sectional analysis showed high correlation and low bias and precision between both methods (CC 0.998, bias 1.62%, precision 2.75%). Absolute volumes were slightly higher for semi-automatic segmentation (manual 5292.2 (3141.4-7862.2) versus semi-automatic 5432.8 (3071.9-7960.2) mL, difference 2.7%, p < 0.001). Longitudinal analysis demonstrated that semi-automatic segmentation accurately measures liver growth (CC 0.908, bias 0.23%, precision 4.04%). Inter- and intra-reader variability were small (2.19% and 0.66%) and comparable to manual segmentation (1.21% and 0.63%) (p = 0.26 and p = 0.37). Semi-automatic segmentation was faster than manual tracing (19 min versus 50 min, p = 0.009).

conclusionsSemi-automatic liver segmentation is a fast and accurate method to determine TLV and liver growth in PLD patients. KEY POINTS: • Semi-automatic liver segmentation using the commercially available MMWP volume tool accurately determines total liver volume as well as liver growth over time in polycystic liver disease patients. • This method is considerably faster than manual segmentation through the use of Hounsfield unit settings. • We used a real-life CT set for the validation and showed that the semi-automatic tool measures accurately regardless of contrast used for the CT scan or not, presence of polycystic kidneys, liver volume, and previous invasive treatment for polycystic liver disease.

Indexed as

Liver DiseasesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultCross-Sectional StudiesCystsHumansReproducibility of ResultsOrgan sizePolycystic kidney diseasePolycystic liver diseaseRadiologyTomography, X-ray computed

Identifiers

PMID36640173
PMCPMC10121488
OpenAlexW4316042173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.