SynthesisJournal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan2023
Effectiveness of moxibustion alone on lumbar disc herniation: a Metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrative Postural Rehabilitation for Kyphotic Deformity in a Patient with Parkinson's Disease: A Case Report and Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- [Conservative therapy for lumbar disc herniation].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Regarding a recently published Meta-analysis on moxibustion for lumbar disc herniation.Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the available evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of moxibustion alone for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) treatment.
methodsA systematic search of 10 databases (until August 30, 2021) was used to identify studies that reported the response rate, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score. Study selection and data extraction were independently performed by two reviewers. Cochrane criteria for risk of bias were used to assess the methodological quality of the trials. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Methodology (GRADE) were also used to test the quality of the result evidence.
resultsNineteen RCTs, including 1888 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Five studies showed no difference between moxibustion and acupuncture on response rate [risk ratio () = 1.07, 95%(0.98, 1.16), = 0.11]. Meanwhile, six studies suggested that there is no significant difference between moxibustion and acupuncture on VAS score [mean difference () = -0.43, 95% (-0.91, 0.05), = 0.08]. Eight studies implied that there is no significant difference between moxibustion and acupuncture on JOA score [ = 0.84, 95% (-1.27, 2.96), = 0.44]. Two studies indicated that moxibustion may have equivalent effects for treating LDH in the VAS score in comparison with drug therapy [ = -1.16, 95% (-2.63, 0.31), = 0.12]. The evidence level of results was determined to be very low to low.
conclusionsBased on the existing evidence, moxibustion may not be suitable for treating LDH alone, but it may be applied as an adjuvant treatment. Furthermore, welldesigned RCTs with high quality and larger samples are still needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of moxibustion alone for LDH treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.