Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36639959›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2023

Access to novel drugs and therapeutics for children and youth: Eliciting citizens' values to inform public funding decisions.

Cindy L Gauvreau, Lisa Wight, Mathushan Subasri, Antonia Palmer, Robin Hayeems, Alysha Croker, Julia Abelson, Brent Fraser, Yvonne Bombard, Charlotte Moore Hepburn and 2 more

Full text read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Digital health equity frameworks and key concepts: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Access to novel drugs and therapeutics for children and youth: Eliciting citizens' values to inform public funding decisions.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Cindy L GauvreauChild Health Evaluative Sciences Program, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3313-6233
Lisa WightChild Health Evaluative Sciences Program, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mathushan SubasriChild Health Evaluative Sciences Program, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Antonia PalmerAc2orn: Advocacy for Canadian Childhood Oncology Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Robin HayeemsChild Health Evaluative Sciences Program, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alysha CrokerCentre for Policy, Pediatrics and International Collaboration, Health Products and Food Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Julia AbelsonHealth Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2907-2783
Brent FraserPharmaceutical Reviews, CADTH, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Yvonne BombardInstitute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Charlotte Moore HepburnInstitute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Michael G WilsonMcMaster Health Forum, Health Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Avram DenburgChild Health Evaluative Sciences Program, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe unique evidentiary, economic and ethical challenges associated with health technology assessment (HTA) of precision therapies limit access to novel drugs and therapeutics for children and youth, for whom such challenges are amplified. We elicited citizens' perspectives about values-based criteria relevant to the assessment of paediatric precision therapies to inform the development of a child-tailored HTA framework.

methodsWe held four citizen panels virtually in May-June 2021, informed by a plain-language citizen brief summarizing global and local evidence about the challenges, policy and programmatic options and implementation strategies related to enhancing access to precision therapies for Canadian children and youth. Panellists were recruited through a nationally representative database, medical/patient networks and social media. We inductively coded and thematically analysed panel transcripts to generate themes and identify priority values.

resultsThe perspectives of panellists (n = 45) coalesced into four overlapping themes, with attendant subthemes, relevant to a child-tailored HTA framework: (1) Childhood Distinctions: vulnerability, 'fair innings', future potential, family impacts; (2) Voice: agency of children and youth; lived versus no lived experience; (3) One versus Many: disease severity, rarity, equity, unmet need and (4) Health System Governance: funding, implementation inequities, effectiveness and safety. Participants broadly agreed that childhood distinctions, particularly family impacts, justify child-tailored HTA. Dissent arose over whose voice should inform HTA and how such perspectives are best incorporated.

conclusionsCitizens can offer unique insights into criteria relevant to the development or revision of HTA frameworks to capture holistic, societally responsive dimensions of value attached to unique contexts or populations, including children. Balancing the hopes and expectations of patients and caregivers for access to expensive but potential life-altering therapies against the opportunity costs borne by encompassing health systems is a fundamental challenge that will require rigorous methods to elicit, weigh and reconcile varied views. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: A patient advocate served on the steering committee of this study and co-authored this article. Key informants for the Citizen Brief included patient advocates and caregivers; a separate patient advocate reviewed the Brief before dissemination. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected from the general public and caregivers of children, with written consent.

Indexed as

PolicyTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalAdolescentCanadaChildCosts and Cost AnalysisHumansaccess to novel drugschildren and youthcitizens' valuesdeliberative public engagementhealth technology assessmentpublic funding decisions

Identifiers

PMID36639959
PMCPMC10010086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read4
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.