Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36639891›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2023

Undermatching Is a Consequence of Policy Compression.

Bilal A Bari, Samuel J Gershman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Computationally Informed Insights Into Anhedonia and Treatment by Kappa Opioid Receptor Antagonism.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2025
    Trial
  2. Reduced Pavlovian Value Updating Alters Decision-Making in Sign-Trackers.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Policy Complexity Suppresses Dopamine Responses.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. Policy complexity suppresses dopamine responses.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Resource-rational psychopathology.Behavioral neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. The role of rat prelimbic cortex in decision making.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Bayesian Reinforcement Learning With Limited Cognitive Load.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bilal A BariDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114.ORCID 0000-0002-8381-3802
Samuel J GershmanDepartment of Psychology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 gershman@fas.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6546-3298

Funding

Towards a Unified Framework for Dopamine Signaling in the StriatumU19NS113201 · NINDS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI SABATINI, BERNARDO L · 2019 to 2023
$18.7M
Fostering Research Mentorship & Training during Psychiatry Residency SupplementR25MH094612 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FAVA, MAURIZIO, GREENFIELD, SHELLY F. · 2011 to 2022
$2.3M
NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH094612NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS113201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The matching law describes the tendency of agents to match the ratio of choices allocated to the ratio of rewards received when choosing among multiple options (Herrnstein, 1961). Perfect matching, however, is infrequently observed. Instead, agents tend to undermatch or bias choices toward the poorer option. Overmatching, or the tendency to bias choices toward the richer option, is rarely observed. Despite the ubiquity of undermatching, it has received an inadequate normative justification. Here, we assume agents not only seek to maximize reward, but also seek to minimize cognitive cost, which we formalize as policy complexity (the mutual information between actions and states of the environment). Policy complexity measures the extent to which the policy of an agent is state dependent. Our theory states that capacity-constrained agents (i.e., agents that must compress their policies to reduce complexity) can only undermatch or perfectly match, but not overmatch, consistent with the empirical evidence. Moreover, using mouse behavioral data (male), we validate a novel prediction about which task conditions exaggerate undermatching. Finally, in patients with Parkinson's disease (male and female), we argue that a reduction in undermatching with higher dopamine levels is consistent with an increased policy complexity.

Indexed as

DopamineParkinson DiseaseAnimalsDecision MakingFemaleMaleMiceRewardDopaminedecision-makingdopamineinformation theorymatchingParkinson's diseasereinforcement learning

Identifiers

PMID36639891
PMCPMC9864556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.