Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36639821›Full record

ArticleMolecular autism2023

Profiles of autism characteristics in thirteen genetic syndromes: a machine learning approach.

Natali Bozhilova, Alice Welham, Dawn Adams, Stacey Bissell, Hilgo Bruining, Hayley Crawford, Kate Eden, Lisa Nelson, Christopher Oliver, Laurie Powis and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular autism, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Natali BozhilovaSchool of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guilford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8109-6483
Alice WelhamSchool of Psychology, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5753-7269
Dawn AdamsAutism Centre of Excellence, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8001-0126
Stacey BissellSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0701-3392
Hilgo BruiningDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0660-1969
Hayley CrawfordMental Health and Wellbeing Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1147-7029
Kate EdenSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK.
Lisa NelsonSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK.
Christopher OliverSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5217-6209
Laurie PowisSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK.
Caroline RichardsSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5444-4147
Jane WaiteSchool of Psychology, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8676-3070
Peter WatsonMRC Brain and Cognition Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Hefin RhysFrancis Crick Institute, London, UK.
Lucy WildeSchool of Psychology, Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.
Kate WoodcockSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8884-2020
Joanna MossSchool of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guilford, UK. j.moss@surrey.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7676-933X
University of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Surrey · GBAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLAston University · GBGriffith University · AUMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GBThe Francis Crick Institute · GBThe Open University · GBUniversity of Leicester · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/14
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhenotypic studies have identified distinct patterns of autistic characteristics in genetic syndromes associated with intellectual disability (ID), leading to diagnostic uncertainty and compromised access to autism-related support. Previous research has tended to include small samples and diverse measures, which limits the generalisability of findings. In this study, we generated detailed profiles of autistic characteristics in a large sample of > 1500 individuals with rare genetic syndromes.

methodsProfiles of autistic characteristics based on the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) scores were generated for thirteen genetic syndrome groups (Angelman n = 154, Cri du Chat n = 75, Cornelia de Lange n = 199, fragile X n = 297, Prader-Willi n = 278, Lowe n = 89, Smith-Magenis n = 54, Down n = 135, Sotos n = 40, Rubinstein-Taybi n = 102, 1p36 deletion n = 41, tuberous sclerosis complex n = 83 and Phelan-McDermid n = 35 syndromes). It was hypothesised that each syndrome group would evidence a degree of specificity in autistic characteristics. To test this hypothesis, a classification algorithm via support vector machine (SVM) learning was applied to scores from over 1500 individuals diagnosed with one of the thirteen genetic syndromes and autistic individuals who did not have a known genetic syndrome (ASD; n = 254). Self-help skills were included as an additional predictor.

resultsGenetic syndromes were associated with different but overlapping autism-related profiles, indicated by the substantial accuracy of the entire, multiclass SVM model (55% correctly classified individuals). Syndrome groups such as Angelman, fragile X, Prader-Willi, Rubinstein-Taybi and Cornelia de Lange showed greater phenotypic specificity than groups such as Cri du Chat, Lowe, Smith-Magenis, tuberous sclerosis complex, Sotos and Phelan-McDermid. The inclusion of the ASD reference group and self-help skills did not change the model accuracy. LIMITATIONS: The key limitations of our study include a cross-sectional design, reliance on a screening tool which focuses primarily on social communication skills and imbalanced sample size across syndrome groups.

conclusionsThese findings replicate and extend previous work, demonstrating syndrome-specific profiles of autistic characteristics in people with genetic syndromes compared to autistic individuals without a genetic syndrome. This work calls for greater precision of assessment of autistic characteristics in individuals with genetic syndromes associated with ID.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderIntellectual DisabilityTuberous SclerosisCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSyndromeAutismBehavioural phenotypeGenetic syndromesMachine learningSVM

Identifiers

PMID36639821
PMCPMC9837969
OpenAlexW4315866063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.