Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36639526›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2023

Electrophysiological and neuropsychological assessment of cognition in spinocerebellar ataxia type 1 patients: a pilot study.

Elena Contaldi, Mariachiara Sensi, Fabiana Colucci, Jay Guido Capone, Arianna Braccia, Mattia Roberto Nocilla, Enrica Diozzi, Eleonora Contini, Anna Chiara Pelizzari, Valeria Tugnoli

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elena ContaldiPhD Program in Medical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of Piemonte Orientale, 28100, Novara, Italy. contaldie@yahoo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0218-5251
Mariachiara SensiDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria S. Anna, 44124, Ferrara, Italy.
Fabiana ColucciDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, 44124, Ferrara, Italy.
Jay Guido CaponeDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria S. Anna, 44124, Ferrara, Italy.
Arianna BracciaDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, 44124, Ferrara, Italy.
Mattia Roberto NocillaDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, University of Ferrara, 44124, Ferrara, Italy.
Enrica DiozziDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria S. Anna, 44124, Ferrara, Italy.
Eleonora ContiniDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria S. Anna, 44124, Ferrara, Italy.
Anna Chiara PelizzariDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria S. Anna, 44124, Ferrara, Italy.
Valeria TugnoliDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria S. Anna, 44124, Ferrara, Italy.
Arcispedale Sant'Anna · ITUniversity of Ferrara · ITUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvent-related potentials (ERPs) reflect cognitive processing: negative early components (N100, N200) are involved in the sensory and perceptual processing of a stimulus, whereas late positive component P300 requires conscious attention. Both neuropsychological and affective disorders are present in patients with spinocerebellar ataxia type 1 (SCA1), but the underlying mechanisms need further clarification. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this pilot study, we assessed cognitive processing by recording auditory ERPs in 16 consecutive SCA1 patients and 16 healthy controls (HC) matched for age and sex. Motor and nonmotor symptoms were evaluated using the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) and an extensive neuropsychological battery. ERPs were recorded using an oddball paradigm, and peak latency and amplitude of N100, N200, and P300 were measured in the averaged responses to target tones.

resultsWe found in SCA1 significantly increased latencies of N200 and P300 (p=0.033, p=0.007) and decreased amplitudes of N100 and P300 (p=0.024, p=0.038) compared with HC. Furthermore, P300 latency had the highest AUC in the discrimination of SCA1 in ROC analysis. The expansion of trinucleotide repeats correlated with P300 latency (r=-0.607, p=0.048), whereas both P300 and N100 amplitudes correlated with the severity of motor symptoms (r=-0.692, p=0.003; r=-0.621; p=0.010). Significant correlations between P300 latency and the scores of Emotion Attribution Task (r=-0.633, p=0.027), as well as between N200 latency and the scores of Frontal Assessment Battery and Stroop test (r=-0.520, p=0.047; r=0.538, p=0.039), were observed.

conclusionsThis research provides for the first time an extensive characterization of ERPs as useful electrophysiological markers to identify early cognitive dysfunction in SCA1.

Indexed as

Event-Related Potentials, P300Evoked Potentials, AuditoryCognitionEvoked PotentialsHumansPilot ProjectsReaction TimeAuditory event-related potentialsCerebellar cognitive affective syndromeN100N200P300SCA1Spinocerebellar ataxia type 1

Identifiers

PMID36639526
PMCPMC10102071
OpenAlexW4316020275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.