Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36639431›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomolecular NMR2023

Assessing the applicability of

Christina Krempl, Remco Sprangers

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. HLA micropolymorphisms confine neoantigen conformational adaptability and guide T cell receptor selectivity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Investigation of structural and dynamic properties of the Butyrophilin BTN3A1/BTN2A1 cytoplasmic complex byFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christina KremplDepartment of Biophysics I, Regensburg Center for Biochemistry, University of Regensburg, 93053, Regensburg, Germany.
Remco SprangersDepartment of Biophysics I, Regensburg Center for Biochemistry, University of Regensburg, 93053, Regensburg, Germany. remco.sprangers@ur.de.
University of Regensburg · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SFB 960 TP/B12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is uniquely suited to study the dynamics of biomolecules in solution. Most NMR studies exploit the spins of proton, carbon and nitrogen isotopes, as these atoms are highly abundant in proteins and nucleic acids. As an alternative and complementary approach, fluorine atoms can be introduced into biomolecules at specific sites of interest. These labels can then be used as sensitive probes for biomolecular structure, dynamics or interactions. Here, we address if the replacement of tryptophan with 5-fluorotryptophan residues has an effect on the overall dynamics of proteins and if the introduced fluorine probe is able to accurately report on global exchange processes. For the four different model proteins (KIX, Dcp1, Dcp2 and DcpS) that we examined, we established that

Indexed as

ProtonsTryptophanFluorineFluorine RadioisotopesNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularProteins5-fluorotryptophanFluorineFluorine RadioisotopesProteinsProtonsTryptophanConformational exchangeCPMG relaxation dispersionDcp1Dcp2DcpSFluorine NMRKIX domainmRNA decappingProtein dynamics

Identifiers

PMID36639431
PMCPMC10149471
OpenAlexW4315979085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.