Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36639373›Full record

ArticleNPJ Regenerative medicine2023

Machine learning-based classification of dual fluorescence signals reveals muscle stem cell fate transitions in response to regenerative niche factors.

Matteo Togninalli, Andrew T V Ho, Christopher M Madl, Colin A Holbrook, Yu Xin Wang, Klas E G Magnusson, Anna Kirillova, Andrew Chang, Helen M Blau

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ Regenerative medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Machine Learning in Stem Cell Research: From Biological Data to Clinical Translation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Matteo Togninalli *Baxter Laboratory for Stem Cell Biology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305-5175, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6554-2167
Andrew T V Ho *Baxter Laboratory for Stem Cell Biology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305-5175, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5501-6419
Christopher M Madl *Baxter Laboratory for Stem Cell Biology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305-5175, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3221-5041
Colin A HolbrookBaxter Laboratory for Stem Cell Biology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305-5175, USA.
Yu Xin WangBaxter Laboratory for Stem Cell Biology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305-5175, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8440-9388
Klas E G MagnussonBaxter Laboratory for Stem Cell Biology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305-5175, USA.
Anna KirillovaBaxter Laboratory for Stem Cell Biology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305-5175, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2113-5257
Andrew ChangBaxter Laboratory for Stem Cell Biology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305-5175, USA.
Helen M BlauBaxter Laboratory for Stem Cell Biology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305-5175, USA. hblau@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6503-5480
Baxter (United States) · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRDiscovery Institute · USInstitute for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine · INKTH Royal Institute of Technology · SEUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Control of Muscle Stem Cells to Enhance RegenerationR01AG075436 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Helen M Blau · 2022 to 2026
$2.5M
Regulation of eicosanoid signaling lipids to improve skeletal muscle function and increase healthspan during agingR01AG069858 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BLAU, HELEN M · 2020 to 2023
$2.4M
Dynamic Biomaterial Design to Probe the Cellular Response to Fibrotic StiffeningR01HL159340 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BLAU, HELEN M · 2021 to 2024
$1.6M
Spatial Regulators of Skeletal Muscle Regeneration and DiseaseR00NS120278 · NINDS · SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE · PI WANG, YU XIN · 2023 to 2025
$739k
Elucidating Effects of Fibrosis on Aged Stem Cells with Dynamic BiomaterialsK99AG071738 · NIA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MADL, CHRISTOPHER MATTHEW · 2021 to 2022
$240k
Spatial Regulators of Skeletal Muscle Regeneration and DiseaseK99NS120278 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, YU XIN · 2020 to 2021
$177k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL159340NIA NIH HHS R01 AG069858NIA NIH HHS R01 AG075436NINDS NIH HHS K99 NS120278NINDS NIH HHS R00 NS120278
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proper regulation of muscle stem cell (MuSC) fate by cues from the niche is essential for regeneration of skeletal muscle. How pro-regenerative niche factors control the dynamics of MuSC fate decisions remains unknown due to limitations of population-level endpoint assays. To address this knowledge gap, we developed a dual fluorescence imaging time lapse (Dual-FLIT) microscopy approach that leverages machine learning classification strategies to track single cell fate decisions with high temporal resolution. Using two fluorescent reporters that read out maintenance of stemness and myogenic commitment, we constructed detailed lineage trees for individual MuSCs and their progeny, classifying each division event as symmetric self-renewing, asymmetric, or symmetric committed. Our analysis reveals that treatment with the lipid metabolite, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), accelerates the rate of MuSC proliferation over time, while biasing division events toward symmetric self-renewal. In contrast, the IL6 family member, Oncostatin M (OSM), decreases the proliferation rate after the first generation, while blocking myogenic commitment. These insights into the dynamics of MuSC regulation by niche cues were uniquely enabled by our Dual-FLIT approach. We anticipate that similar binary live cell readouts derived from Dual-FLIT will markedly expand our understanding of how niche factors control tissue regeneration in real time.

Identifiers

PMID36639373
PMCPMC9839750
OpenAlexW4315979045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.