Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36638200›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2023

Research Silos in Cancer Disparities: Obstacles to Improving Clinical Outcomes for Underserved Patient Populations.

Angelique Richardson, Burcu Darst, Genevieve Wojcik, Nikhil Wagle, Svasti Haricharan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Angelique RichardsonDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.ORCID 0000-0002-8944-0066
Burcu DarstPublic Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0002-6205-4632
Genevieve WojcikDepartment of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-7206-8088
Nikhil WagleDepartment of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-3332-9438
Svasti HaricharanCancer Center, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, California.ORCID 0000-0002-4471-8853
Discovery Institute · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USHarvard University · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of San Diego · US

Funding

VIRAL MALIGNANCYP30CA023100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DIANE M SIMEONE · 1985 to 2026
$124.9M
Tumor Microenvironment and Cancer ImmunologyP30CA030199 · NCI · SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE · PI ELENA B PASQUALE · 1985 to 2026
$107.2M
THE RNA HELICASE EIF4A IS A THERAPEUTIC VULNERABILITY IN TRIPLE-NEGATIVE BREAST CANCERU54CA233223 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI MITSIADES, NICHOLAS · 2018 to 2022
$7.0M
The influence of genetic ancestry and population-specific epidemiology on the transferability of genomic findings to diverse and admixed populationsR35HG011944 · NHGRI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WOJCIK, GENEVIEVE LIANNE · 2021 to 2025
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023100NCI NIH HHS P30 CA030199NCI NIH HHS U54 CA233223NHGRI NIH HHS R35 HG011944
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite much vaunted progress in cancer therapeutics and diagnostics, outcomes for many groups of non-White patients with cancer remain worse than those for their White compatriots. One reason for this is the lack of inclusion and representation of non-White patients in clinical trials, preclinical datasets, and among researchers, a shortfall that is gaining wide recognition within the cancer research community and the lay public. Several reviews and editorials have commented on the negative impacts of the status quo on progress in cancer research toward medical breakthroughs that help all communities and not just White patients with cancer. In this perspective, we describe the existence of research silos focused either on the impact of socioeconomic factors proceeding from systemic racism on cancer outcomes, or on genetic ancestry as it affects the molecular biology of cancer developing in specific patient populations. While both these research areas are critical for progress toward precision medicine equity, breaking down these silos will help us gain an integrated understanding of how race and racism impact cancer development, progression, and patient outcomes. Bringing this comprehensive approach to cancer disparities research will undoubtedly improve our overall understanding of how stress and environmental factors affect the molecular biology of cancer, which will lead to the development of new diagnostics and therapeutics that are applicable across cancer patient demographics.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsVulnerable PopulationsHumans

Identifiers

PMID36638200
PMCPMC10073283
OpenAlexW4316015659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.