Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36638198›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2023

A Phase Ib/II Trial of Combined BRAF and EGFR Inhibition in BRAF V600E Positive Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and Other Cancers: The EVICT (Erlotinib and Vemurafenib In Combination Trial) Study.

Lavinia Tan, Ben Tran, Jeanne Tie, Ben Markman, Sumi Ananda, Niall C Tebbutt, Michael Michael, Emma Link, Stephen Q Wong, Sushma Chandrashekar and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Targeted therapy in advancedBMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Surrogate to predict overall survival in patients withESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Expert consensus on the optimal management of BRAFAsia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Lavinia Tan *Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5641-4972
Ben Tran *Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9124-354X
Jeanne TiePeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9244-2057
Ben MarkmanMonash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0080-2842
Sumi AnandaPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5525-605X
Niall C TebbuttOlivia Newton John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2613-5168
Michael MichaelPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0593-2662
Emma LinkPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5461-3799
Stephen Q WongPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7335-2168
Sushma ChandrashekarPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1959-7401
Jerick GuintoPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1406-6628
David RitchiePeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7329-6605
Rachel KoldejACRF Translational Research Laboratory, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1627-8934
Benjamin J SolomonPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3059-5730
Grant A McArthurPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8908-6071
Rodney J HicksThe University of Melbourne Department of Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0758-0824
Peter GibbsDivision of Personalized Oncology, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1423-4484
Sarah-Jane Dawson *Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8276-0374
Jayesh Desai *Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4246-9344
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUMonash Health · AUOlivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeBRAF V600E mutant metastatic colorectal cancer represents a significant clinical problem, with combination approaches being developed clinically with oral BRAF inhibitors combined with EGFR-targeting antibodies. While compelling preclinical data have highlighted the effectiveness of combination therapy with vemurafenib and small-molecule EGFR inhibitors, gefitinib or erlotinib, in colorectal cancer, this therapeutic strategy has not been investigated in clinical studies. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe conducted a phase Ib/II dose-escalation/expansion trial investigating the safety/efficacy of the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib and EGFR inhibitor erlotinib.

resultsThirty-two patients with BRAF V600E positive metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and 7 patients with other cancers were enrolled. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in escalation, with vemurafenib 960 mg twice daily with erlotinib 150 mg daily selected as the recommended phase II dose. Among 31 evaluable patients with mCRC and 7 with other cancers, overall response rates were 32% [10/31, 16% (5/31) confirmed] and 43% (3/7), respectively, with clinical benefit rates of 65% and 100%. Early ctDNA dynamics were predictive of treatment efficacy, and serial ctDNA monitoring revealed distinct patterns of convergent genomic evolution associated with acquired treatment resistance, with frequent emergence of MAPK pathway alterations, including polyclonal KRAS, NRAS, and MAP2K1 mutations, and MET amplification.

conclusionsThe Erlotinib and Vemurafenib In Combination Trial study demonstrated a safe and novel combination of two oral inhibitors targeting BRAF and EGFR. The dynamic assessment of serial ctDNA was a useful measure of underlying genomic changes in response to this combination and in understanding potential mechanisms of resistance.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsRectal NeoplasmsErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideHumansIndolesMutationProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafSulfonamidesVemurafenibBRAF protein, humanEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsErlotinib HydrochlorideIndolesProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafSulfonamidesVemurafenib

Identifiers

PMID36638198
PMCPMC10011885
OpenAlexW4316015514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.