ArticleProteomics2023
A differential proteomics study of cerebrospinal fluid from individuals with Niemann-Pick disease, Type C1.
Article in Proteomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of serum protein biomarkers in individuals with Niemann-Pick disease, type C1.Biomarker research · 2026Article
- Identification of serum protein biomarkers in individuals with Niemann-Pick disease, type C1.Research square · 2026Article
- Identification of serum protein biomarkers in individuals with Niemann-Pick disease, type C1.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Biomarker Validation in NPC1: Foundations for Clinical Trials and Regulatory Alignment.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2025Review
- Altered Cerebrospinal Fluid Proteins in Smith-Lemli-Opitz Syndrome.Journal of proteome research · 2025Article
- Serum neurofilament light protein as a biomarker in Niemann-Pick disease, type C1.Genetics in medicine open · 2025Article
- Advances in research on potential therapeutic approaches for Niemann-Pick C1 disease.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Elevated cerebrospinal fluid ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 levels correlate with phenotypic severity and therapeutic response in Niemann-Pick disease, type C1.Molecular genetics and metabolism · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Niemann-Pick, type C1 (NPC1) is a fatal, neurodegenerative disease, which belongs to the family of lysosomal diseases. In NPC1, endo/lysosomal accumulation of unesterified cholesterol and sphingolipids arise from improper intracellular trafficking resulting in multi-organ dysfunction. With the proximity between the brain and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), performing differential proteomics provides a means to shed light to changes occurring in the brain. In this study, CSF samples obtained from NPC1 individuals and unaffected controls were used for protein biomarker identification. A subset of these individuals with NPC1 are being treated with miglustat, a glycosphingolipid synthesis inhibitor. Of the 300 identified proteins, 71 proteins were altered in individuals with NPC1 compared to controls including cathepsin D, and members of the complement family. Included are a report of 10 potential markers for monitoring therapeutic treatment. We observed that pro-neuropeptide Y (NPY) was significantly increased in NPC1 individuals relative to healthy controls; however, individuals treated with miglustat displayed levels comparable to healthy controls. In further investigation, NPY levels in a NPC1 mouse model corroborated our findings. We posit that NPY could be a potential therapeutic target for NPC1 due to its multiple roles in the central nervous system such as attenuating neuroinflammation and reducing excitotoxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.