Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36638148›Full record

Trial reportInternational braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology

Predictive model for urosepsis in patients with Upper Urinary Tract Calculi based on ultrasonography and urinalysis using artificial intelligence learning.

Xuwei Hong, Guoyuan Liu, Zepai Chi, Tenghao Yang, Yonghai Zhang

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xuwei HongDepartment of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
Guoyuan LiuDepartment of Urology, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, 515031, P. R. China.
Zepai ChiDepartment of Urology, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, 515031, P. R. China.
Tenghao YangDepartment of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, P. R. China.
Yonghai ZhangDepartment of Urology, Shantou Central Hospital, Shantou, 515031, P. R. China.
Shantou Central Hospital · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo construct a predicting model for urosepsis risk for patients with upper urinary tract calculi based on ultrasound and urinalysis. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective study was conducted in patients with upper urinary tract calculi admitted between January 2016 and January 2020. The patients were randomly grouped into the training and validation sets. The training set was used to identify the urosepsis risk factors and construct a risk prediction model based on ultrasound and urinalysis. The validation set was used to test the performance of the artificial neural network (ANN).

resultsUltimately, 1716 patients (10.8% cases and 89.2% control) were included. Eight variables were selected for the model: sex, age, body temperature, diabetes history, urine leukocytes, urine nitrite, urine glucose, and degree of hydronephrosis. The area under the receiver operating curve in the validation and training sets was 0.945 (95% CI: 0.903-0.988) and 0.992 (95% CI: 0.988-0.997), respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and Yuden index of the validation set (training set) were 80.4% (85.9%), 98.2% (99.0%), and 0.786 (0.849), respectively.

conclusionsA preliminary screening model for urosepsis based on ultrasound and urinalysis was constructed using ANN. The model could provide risk assessments for urosepsis in patients with upper urinary tract calculi.

Indexed as

SepsisUrinary CalculiUrinary TractUrinary Tract InfectionsArtificial IntelligenceHumansRetrospective StudiesUltrasonographyUrinalysisNeural Networks, ComputerUltrasonographyUrinary Calculi

Identifiers

PMID36638148
PMCPMC10247237
OpenAlexW4315927646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.