Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36638095›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Multi-amplicon microbiome data analysis pipelines for mixed orientation sequences using QIIME2: Assessing reference database, variable region and pre-processing bias in classification of mock bacterial community samples.

Katherine A Maki, Brian Wolff, Leonardo Varuzza, Stefan J Green, Jennifer J Barb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Investigation of probiotic, anticancer and antimicrobial activity of Enterococcus bacteria isolated from the gut microbiota of marine snails.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Plant growth-promoting endophytic microbiota from garlic bulbs.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Influence of Varied Environment Conditions on the Gut Microbiota of Yaks.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katherine A MakiTranslational Biobehavioral and Health Disparities Branch, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4578-960X
Brian WolffNational Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0886-823X
Leonardo VaruzzaThermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States of America.
Stefan J GreenGenomics and Microbiome Core Facility, Rush University, Chicago, IL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2781-359X
Jennifer J BarbTranslational Biobehavioral and Health Disparities Branch, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3022-0154

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbiome research relies on next-generation sequencing and on downstream data analysis workflows. Several manufacturers have introduced multi-amplicon kits for microbiome characterization, improving speciation, but present unique challenges for analysis. The goal of this methodology study was to develop two analysis pipelines specific to mixed-orientation reads from multi-hypervariable (V) region amplicons. A secondary aim was to assess agreement with expected abundance, considering database and variable region. Mock community sequence data (n = 41) generated using the Ion16S™ Metagenomics Kit and Ion Torrent Sequencing Platform were analyzed using two workflows. Amplicons from V2, V3, V4, V6-7, V8 and V9 were deconvoluted using a specialized plugin based on CutPrimers. A separate workflow using Cutadapt is also presented. Three reference databases (Ribosomal Database Project, Greengenes and Silva) were used for taxonomic assignment. Bray-Curtis, Euclidean and Jensen-Shannon distance measures were used to evaluate overall annotation consistency, and specific taxon agreement was determined by calculating the ratio of observed to expected relative abundance. Reads that mapped to regions V2-V9 varied for both CutPrimers and Cutadapt-based methods. Within the CutPrimers-based pipeline, V3 amplicons had the best agreement with the expected distribution, tested using global distance measures, while V9 amplicons had the worst agreement. Accurate taxonomic annotation varied by genus-level taxon and V region analyzed. For the first time, we present a microbiome analysis pipeline that employs a specialized plugin to allow microbiome researchers to separate multi-amplicon data from the Ion16S Metagenomics Kit into V-specific reads. We also present an additional analysis workflow, modified for Ion Torrent mixed orientation reads. Overall, the global agreement of amplicons with the expected mock community abundances differed across V regions and reference databases. Benchmarking data should be referenced when planning a microbiome study to consider these biases related to sequencing and data analysis for multi-amplicon sequencing kits.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaBacteriaData AnalysisDatabases, FactualHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID36638095
PMCPMC9838852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.