Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36637770›Full record

ArticleFolia microbiologica2023

The structural discrepancy between the small and large gut microbiota of Asiatic toad (Bufo gargarizans) during hibernation.

Xiaowei Song, Yuanyuan Zhai, Jinghan Song, Jingwei Zhang, Xiangzhen Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Folia microbiologica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Gut Microbiome of the Asiatic Toad (Ecology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaowei SongCollege of Software Engineering, Chengdu University of Information and Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. sxw@cuit.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6146-3381
Yuanyuan ZhaiCollege of Life Sciences, Institute for Conservation and Utilization of Agro-Bioresources in Dabie Mountains, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang, Henan, China.
Jinghan SongCollege of Life Sciences, Institute for Conservation and Utilization of Agro-Bioresources in Dabie Mountains, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang, Henan, China.
Jingwei ZhangHospital of Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang Normal University, Henan, Xinyang, China.
Xiangzhen LiCAS Key Laboratory of Environmental and Applied Microbiology, Environmental Microbiology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Xinyang Normal University · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

Key R&D and Promotion Projects of Henan Province 192102110005National Natural Science Foundation of China 31600104
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hibernating amphibians are suitable for the research on the adaptation of gut microbiota to long-term fasting and cold stresses. However, the previous studies mainly focus on the large or whole gut microbiota but not the small gut microbiota. To test the structural discrepancy between the small and large gut microbiota during hibernation, we performed two independent batches of 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing to profile the small and large gut microbiota of hibernating Asiatic toad (Bufo gargarizans) from two wild populations. Both batches of data revealed that Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Firmicutes were the three most dominant phyla in the small and large gut microbiota. Three core OTUs with 100% occurrence in all gut microbiotas were annotated as Pseudomonas. A significant structural discrepancy was detected between the small and large gut microbiota. For instance, Proteobacteria assembled in the small intestine with a higher proportion than it did in the large intestine, but Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes assembled in the large intestine with a higher proportion than they did in the small intestine. The large gut microbiota exhibited higher diversity than the small gut microbiota. Nevertheless, a severe batch effect existed in the structural analysis of the gut microbiotas. The large gut microbiota showed a better resistance to the batch effect than the small gut microbiota did. This study provides preliminary evidence that microbes assemble in the small and large intestines of amphibians with discrepant patterns during hibernation.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeHibernationAnimalsBufonidaeRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNAAmphibianBatch effectGut microbiomeHibernation

Identifiers

PMID36637770
OpenAlexW4315928086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.