Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36637740›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2023

Radiomic and quantitative-semantic models of low-dose computed tomography for predicting the poorly differentiated invasive non-mucinous pulmonary adenocarcinoma.

Yong Li, Jieke Liu, Xi Yang, Fuyang Xu, Lu Wang, Changjiu He, Libo Lin, Haomiao Qing, Jing Ren, Peng Zhou

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yong Li *Department of Radiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No.55, Section 4, South Renmin Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Jieke Liu *Department of Radiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No.55, Section 4, South Renmin Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Xi YangDepartment of Radiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No.55, Section 4, South Renmin Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Fuyang XuDepartment of Radiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No.55, Section 4, South Renmin Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Lu WangDepartment of Radiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No.55, Section 4, South Renmin Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Changjiu HeDepartment of Radiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No.55, Section 4, South Renmin Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Libo LinDepartment of Radiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No.55, Section 4, South Renmin Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Haomiao QingDepartment of Radiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No.55, Section 4, South Renmin Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Jing RenDepartment of Radiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No.55, Section 4, South Renmin Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
Peng ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No.55, Section 4, South Renmin Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China. penghyzhou@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1281-6088
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CN

Funding

Chengdu Science and Technology Program 2021-YF05-01507-SNNational Natural Science Foundation of China 82202141Sichuan Science and Technology Program 2021YFS0075Sichuan Science and Technology Program 2021YFS0225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePoorly differentiated invasive non-mucinous pulmonary adenocarcinoma (IPA), based on the novel grading system, was related to poor prognosis, with a high risk of lymph node metastasis and local recurrence. This study aimed to build the radiomic and quantitative-semantic models of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) to preoperatively predict the poorly differentiated IPA in nodules with solid component, and compare their diagnostic performance with radiologists. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 396 nodules from 388 eligible patients, who underwent LDCT scan within 2 weeks before surgery and were pathologically diagnosed with IPA, were retrospectively enrolled between July 2018 and December 2021. Nodules were divided into two independent cohorts according to scanners: primary cohort (195 well/moderate differentiated and 64 poorly differentiated) and validation cohort (104 well/moderate differentiated and 33 poorly differentiated). The radiomic and quantitative-semantic models were built using multivariable logistic regression. The diagnostic performance of the models and radiologists was assessed by area under curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.

resultsNo significant differences of AUCs were found between the radiomic and quantitative-semantic model in primary and validation cohorts (0.921 vs. 0.923, P = 0.846 and 0.938 vs. 0.911, P = 0.161). Both the models outperformed three radiologists in the validation cohort (all P < 0.05).

conclusionsThe radiomic and quantitative-semantic models of LDCT, which could identify the poorly differentiated IPA with excellent diagnostic performance, might provide guidance for therapeutic decision making, such as choosing appropriate surgical method or adjuvant chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungLung NeoplasmsHumansRetrospective StudiesSemanticsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdenocarcinoma of lungLow-dose computed tomographyLung cancerRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID36637740
OpenAlexW4315880764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.