Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36637727›Full record

ReviewFrontiers of optoelectronics2021

3D printing of glass by additive manufacturing techniques: a review.

Dao Zhang, Xiaofeng Liu, Jianrong Qiu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers of optoelectronics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Lung cell toxicological effects of 3D printer aerosolized filament byproducts.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Growing three-dimensional objects with light.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Light Distribution in 3D-Printed Thermoplastics.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dao ZhangState Key Laboratory of Modern Optical Instrumentation and School of Optical Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027, China.
Xiaofeng LiuSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027, China.
Jianrong QiuState Key Laboratory of Modern Optical Instrumentation and School of Optical Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310027, China. qjr@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM), which is also known as three-dimensional (3D) printing, uses computer-aided design to build objects layer by layer. Here, we focus on the recent progress in the development of techniques for 3D printing of glass, an important optoelectronic material, including fused deposition modeling, selective laser sintering/melting, stereolithography (SLA) and direct ink writing. We compare these 3D printing methods and analyze their benefits and problems for the manufacturing of functional glass objects. In addition, we discuss the technological principles of 3D glass printing and applications of 3D printed glass objects. This review is finalized by a summary of the current achievements and perspectives for the future development of the 3D glass printing technique.

Indexed as

digital light processing (DLP)direct ink write (DIW)fused deposition modeling (FDM)glassmicrofluidicoptical devicesselective laser sintering/melting (SLS/SLM)stereolithography (SLA)three-dimensional (3D) printing

Identifiers

PMID36637727
PMCPMC9743845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.