ArticleMolecular diversity2024
LGBM-ACp: an ensemble model for anticancer peptide prediction and in silico screening with potential drug targets.
Article in Molecular diversity, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Protein Sequence Analysis landscape: A Systematic Review of Task Types, Databases, Datasets, Word Embeddings Methods, and Language Models.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025Pooled it
- DeepACPred: an integrated multistage framework for anticancer peptide discovery and activity prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-driven anticancer peptide discovery.iMetaOmics · 2025Review
- Anticancer peptides from induced tumor-suppressing cells for inhibiting osteosarcoma cells.American journal of cancer research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventional cancer therapies are highly expensive and have serious complications. An alternative approach now emphasizes on the development of small, biologically active peptides without acute toxicity. Experimental screening to find curative anticancer peptides (ACP) often gives rise to multiple obstacles and is time dependent. Consequently, developing an effective computational technique to identify promising ACP candidates prior to preclinical research is in high demand. This study proposed a machine-learning framework that used the light gradient-boosting machine as a classifier and two compositional and two binary profile features as input. The ensemble model displayed an accuracy, MCC, and AUROC of 97.52%, 0.91, and 0.98, respectively, which outclassed most of the existing sequence-based computational tools. A distinct dataset of non-mutagenic, non-toxic, and non-inhibitory Cytochrome P-450 peptides was used to validate the hybrid model. The most relevant ACP in the alternative dataset was compared with two standard ACPs, beta defensin 2, and cecropin-A. Molecular docking of the predicted peptide revealed that it has a strong binding affinity with twenty-five anticancer drug targets, most notably phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (- 7.2 kcal/mol). Additionally, molecular dynamics simulation and principal component analysis supported the stability of the peptide-receptor complex. Overall, the present findings will take a step forward in rational drug design through rapid identification and screening of therapeutic peptides.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.