Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36637680›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2023

The reproducibility of MTV and TLG of soft tissue tumors calculated by FDG-PET: Comparison between the lower limit by the fixed value SUV 2.5 and that value by 30% of SUVmax.

Hitomi Iwasa, Shigeki Nagamachi, Shizuhide Nakayama, Takuaki Yamamoto, Kengo Yoshimitsu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The Role of [Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Correlation betweenQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hitomi IwasaDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-Ku, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.
Shigeki NagamachiDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-Ku, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan. snagama@fukuoka-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2941-9668
Shizuhide NakayamaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Takuaki YamamotoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kengo YoshimitsuDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-Ku, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe evaluated the reproducibility calculating volume-based FDG-PET/CT parameters, i.e., metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG), in soft tissue tumors. MATERIALS AND

methodsFifty-three cases with soft tissue tumors were analyzed retrospectively. The conditions determining the lower limit of MTV were fixed value SUV 2.5 or 30% of SUVmax. To investigate the agreement of the measurements by two radiologists, %difference, the correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plot were analyzed. We compared these parameters in both intra- and inter-operator for evaluating the agreement in the measurements.

resultsThe values of % difference were excellent, 0.2-3.5%, in the intra-operator in all calculated volume-based parameters. In both inter- and intra-operator analysis, the values of % differences were lower in the parameters calculated by SUV 2.5 fixed value as a lower threshold compared with those calculated by 30% of SUVmax as a lower threshold. The correlation coefficient in MTV30% for inter-operator were 0.84 or 0.87, those were lower than values by the intra-operator evaluation. Nevertheless, the correlation coefficients were higher than 0.84 in every parameter. Particularly, correlation coefficient in the parameters calculated by SUV 2.5 fixed value was better than those calculated by 30% of SUVmax. The Bland-Altman plot analysis showed good agreement for all parameters, particularly in the intra-operator examinations. However, in the inter-operator study, some variances were noted in every condition.

conclusionIn conclusion, the reproducibility of measuring volume-based FDG-PET/CT parameters of soft tissue tumors was good, particularly, in the measurement by fixed lower limit value SUV 2.5 in the intra-operator.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyGlycolysisHumansPrognosisRadiopharmaceuticalsReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesTumor BurdenFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsFDG-PETMTVReproducibilitySoft-tissue tumorTLG

Identifiers

PMID36637680
PMCPMC10147792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.