Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36637630›Full record

ReviewJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2023

Special considerations in the design and implementation of pediatric otoprotection trials.

David R Freyer, Etan Orgel, Kristin Knight, Mark Krailo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. KSR1 Knockout Mouse Model Demonstrates MAPK Pathway's Key Role in Cisplatin- and Noise-induced Hearing Loss.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David R FreyerCancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. dfreyer@chla.usc.edu.
Etan OrgelCancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Kristin KnightDepartment of Audiology, Doernbecher Children's Hospital, Portland, OR, USA.
Mark KrailoDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
University of Southern California · USChildren's Hospital of Los Angeles · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Prevention of Cisplatin-induced Hearing Loss in Children with CancerK23DC014291 · NIDCD · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES · PI ORGEL, ETAN · 2016 to 2021
$1.0M
NIDCD NIH HHS K23 DC014291
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCisplatin-induced hearing loss (CIHL) is a common late effect after childhood cancer treatment having profound, lifelong consequences that lower quality of life. The recent identification of intravenous sodium thiosulfate (STS) as an effective agent for preventing pediatric CIHL represents a paradigm shift that has created new opportunities for expanding STS usage and developing additional otoprotectants. The purpose of this paper is to discuss key considerations and recommendations for the design and implementation of future pediatric otoprotection trials.

methodsAn approach synthesizing published data and collective experience was used.

resultsKey issues were identified in the categories of translational research, trial designs for systemic and intratympanic agents, measurement of ototoxicity, and biostatistical challenges.

conclusionsFuture pediatric otoprotection trials should emphasize (1) deep integration of preclinical and early-phase studies; (2) an embedded or free-standing design for systemic agents based on mechanistic considerations; (3) use of suitable audiologic testing batteries for children, SIOP grading criteria, and submission of raw audiologic data for central review; and (4) novel endpoints and innovative study designs that maximize trial efficiency for limited sample sizes. Additional recommendations include routine collection of DNA specimens for assessing modifying effects of genetic susceptibility and meaningful inclusion of patient/family advocates for informing trial development. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Changing the historical paradigm from acceptance to prevention of pediatric CIHL through expanded research with existing and emerging otoprotectants will dramatically improve quality of life for future childhood cancer survivors exposed to cisplatin.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCancer SurvivorsHearing LossCarboplatinChildCisplatinHumansQuality of LifeThiosulfatesAntineoplastic AgentsCarboplatinCisplatinsodium thiosulfateThiosulfatesCancer survivorshipCisplatin-induced hearing lossClinical trialsLate effectsOtoprotectionSodium thiosulfate

Identifiers

PMID36637630
OpenAlexW4315928077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.