Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36637206›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2023

Development and CT image-domain validation of a computational lung lesion model for use in virtual imaging trials.

Thomas J Sauer, Adrian Bejan, Paul Segars, Ehsan Samei

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Black-box Optimization of CT Acquisition and Reconstruction Parameters: A Reinforcement Learning Approach.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Synthetic data in generalizable, learning-based neuroimaging.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas J SauerCarl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Adrian BejanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Paul SegarsCarl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Ehsan SameiCarl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University · USDuke University Hospital · US

Funding

TR&D Project 3: Virtual ReadersP41EB028744 · NIBIB · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Ehsan Samei · 2021 to 2026
$7.8M
Simulation Tools for Dynamic CTR01EB001838 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SAMEI, EHSAN, SEGARS, WILLIAM P · 2005 to 2023
$6.9M
eXtended Modular ANthropomorphic (XMAN) phantom for Imaging and Treatment Optimization in Radiotherapy.R01EB032680 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI REN, LEI, YANG, XIAOFENG · 2022 to 2025
$2.4M
Toward precision radiotherapy: Physiological modeling of respiratory motion based on ultra-quality 4D-MRIR01CA226899 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI CAI, JING, MILLER, G. WILSON · 2019 to 2023
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA226899NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB028744NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB001838NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB032680NIH HHS P41EB028744NIH HHS R01EB001838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeComputational abnormalities (e.g., lesion models) for use in medical imaging simulation studies are frequently generated using data collected from clinical images. Although this approach allows for highly-customizable lesion detectability studies on clinical computed tomography (CT) data, the ground-truth lesion models produced with this method do not provide a sufficiently realistic lesion morphology for use with current anthropomorphic simulation studies. This work is intended to demonstrate that the new anatomically-informed lesion model presented here is not inferior to the previous lesion model under CT imaging, and can therefore provide a more biologically-informed model for use with simulated CT imaging studies.

methodsThe lesion model was simulated initially from a seed cell with 10 μm diameter placed in an anatomical location within segmented lung CT and was allowed to reproduce locally within the available solid angle in discrete time-intervals (corresponding to synchronous cell cycles) up to a size of ∼200 μm in diameter. Daughter cells of generation G were allowed also to reproduce on the next available time-step given sufficient space. At lesion sizes beyond 200 μm in diameter, the health of subregions of cells were tracked with a Markov chain technique, indicating which regions were likely to continue growing, which were likely stable, and which were likely to develop necrosis given their proximity to anatomical features and other lesion cells. For lesion sizes beyond 500 μm, the lesion was represented with three nested, triangulated surfaces (corresponding to proliferating, dormant, and necrotic regions), indicating how discrete volumes of the lesion were behaving at a particular time. Lesions were then assigned smoothly-varying material properties based on their cellular level health in each region, resulting in a multi-material lesion model. The lesions produced with this model were then voxelized and placed into lung CT images for comparison with both prior work and clinical data. This model was subject to an observer study in which cardiothoracic imaging radiologists assessed the realism of both clinical and synthetic lesions in CT images.

resultsThe useable outputs of this work were voxel- or surface-based, validated, computational lesions, at a scale clearly visible on clinical CT (3-4 cm). Analysis of the observer study results indicated that the computationally-generated lesions were indistinguishable from clinical lesions (AUC = 0.49, 95% CI = [0.36, 0.61]) and non-inferior to an earlier image-based lesion model-indicating the advantage of the model for use in both hybrid CT images and in simulated CT imaging of the lungs.

conclusionsResults indicated the non-inferiority of this model as compared to previous methods, indicating the utility of the model for use in both hybrid CT images and in simulated CT imaging.

Indexed as

RadiologistsTomography, X-Ray ComputedComputer SimulationHumansLungPhantoms, Imagingcellcomputed tomographyintegration of multiscale informationtissue modelingx-ray imaging

Identifiers

PMID36637206
PMCPMC10338637
OpenAlexW4315928489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.