ArticleMedical physics2023
Development and CT image-domain validation of a computational lung lesion model for use in virtual imaging trials.
Article in Medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Insertion of hepatic lesions into clinical photon-counting-detector CT projection data.Physics in medicine and biology · 2025Article
- Virtual lung screening trial (VLST): An in silico study inspired by the national lung screening trial for lung cancer detection.Medical image analysis · 2025Article
- XCAT 3.0: A comprehensive library of personalized digital twins derived from CT scans.Medical image analysis · 2025Article
- Virtual Lung Screening Trial (VLST): AnArXiv · 2025Article
- Black-box Optimization of CT Acquisition and Reconstruction Parameters: A Reinforcement Learning Approach.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2025Article
- The potential of photon-counting CT for the improved precision of lung nodule radiomics.Physics in medicine and biology · 2025Article
- Generative Adversarial Networks With Radiomics Supervision for Lung Lesion Generation.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2025Article
- Photon-Counting CT Effects on Sensitivity for Liver Lesion Detection: A Reader Study Using Virtual Imaging.Radiology · 2025Article
- Toward widespread use of virtual trials in medical imaging innovation and regulatory science.Medical physics · 2024Review
- Performance evaluation of a 4D similarity filter for dynamic CT angiography imaging of the liver.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Synthetic data in generalizable, learning-based neuroimaging.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Photon-counting computed tomography versus energy-integrating computed tomography for detection of small liver lesions: comparison using a virtual framework imaging.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024Article
- Synthetic data in radiological imaging: current state and future outlook.BJR artificial intelligence · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeComputational abnormalities (e.g., lesion models) for use in medical imaging simulation studies are frequently generated using data collected from clinical images. Although this approach allows for highly-customizable lesion detectability studies on clinical computed tomography (CT) data, the ground-truth lesion models produced with this method do not provide a sufficiently realistic lesion morphology for use with current anthropomorphic simulation studies. This work is intended to demonstrate that the new anatomically-informed lesion model presented here is not inferior to the previous lesion model under CT imaging, and can therefore provide a more biologically-informed model for use with simulated CT imaging studies.
methodsThe lesion model was simulated initially from a seed cell with 10 μm diameter placed in an anatomical location within segmented lung CT and was allowed to reproduce locally within the available solid angle in discrete time-intervals (corresponding to synchronous cell cycles) up to a size of ∼200 μm in diameter. Daughter cells of generation G were allowed also to reproduce on the next available time-step given sufficient space. At lesion sizes beyond 200 μm in diameter, the health of subregions of cells were tracked with a Markov chain technique, indicating which regions were likely to continue growing, which were likely stable, and which were likely to develop necrosis given their proximity to anatomical features and other lesion cells. For lesion sizes beyond 500 μm, the lesion was represented with three nested, triangulated surfaces (corresponding to proliferating, dormant, and necrotic regions), indicating how discrete volumes of the lesion were behaving at a particular time. Lesions were then assigned smoothly-varying material properties based on their cellular level health in each region, resulting in a multi-material lesion model. The lesions produced with this model were then voxelized and placed into lung CT images for comparison with both prior work and clinical data. This model was subject to an observer study in which cardiothoracic imaging radiologists assessed the realism of both clinical and synthetic lesions in CT images.
resultsThe useable outputs of this work were voxel- or surface-based, validated, computational lesions, at a scale clearly visible on clinical CT (3-4 cm). Analysis of the observer study results indicated that the computationally-generated lesions were indistinguishable from clinical lesions (AUC = 0.49, 95% CI = [0.36, 0.61]) and non-inferior to an earlier image-based lesion model-indicating the advantage of the model for use in both hybrid CT images and in simulated CT imaging of the lungs.
conclusionsResults indicated the non-inferiority of this model as compared to previous methods, indicating the utility of the model for use in both hybrid CT images and in simulated CT imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.