Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36637101›Full record

ArticleTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene2023

Comparative analysis of glass and Hemotek membrane feeding systems for malaria transmission research.

Wouter Graumans, Michelle Schinkel, Geert-Jan van Gemert, Jeroen Spitzen, Teun Bousema, Pascal Miesen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Wouter GraumansDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen 6500 HB, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3952-6491
Michelle SchinkelDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen 6500 HB, The Netherlands.
Geert-Jan van GemertDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen 6500 HB, The Netherlands.
Jeroen SpitzenLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University, Wageningen 6500 HB, The Netherlands.
Teun BousemaDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen 6500 HB, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2666-094X
Pascal MiesenDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Nijmegen 6500 HB, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlass membrane feeders are used in malaria research for artificial blood feeding. This study investigates the use of Hemotek membrane feeders as a standardized alternative feeding system.

methodsHemotek feeders were compared with glass feeders by assessing mosquito feeding rate, imbibed blood meal volume and Plasmodium falciparum infection intensity on mosquito guts.

resultsWhile mosquito feeding rate and blood meal volume were comparable between Hemotek and glass feeders, a loss in transmission was observed using the Hemotek feeder with a conventional collagen membrane. There was no difference in transmission between both feeders when Parafilm was used as the membrane.

conclusionsHemotek feeders with a Parafilm membrane can be used as an alternative feeding system for malaria transmission research.

Indexed as

AnophelesMalariaMalaria, FalciparumAnimalsHumansMosquito VectorsParaffinPlasmodium falciparumParaffinartificial feeding systemblood mealgametocytesPlasmodium falciparum

Identifiers

PMID36637101
PMCPMC10235806
OpenAlexW4315926449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.