Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36636816›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2023

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on perinatal services and maternal mental health in the UK.

Lorraine S Kasaven, Isabel Raynaud, Maria Jalmbrant, Karen Joash, Benjamin P Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Maternal deaths in the UK before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lorraine S KasavenDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, UK; Cutrale Perioperative and Ageing Group, Imperial College London, UK; and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Charlottes and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1752-5220
Isabel RaynaudWest Middlesex University Hospital, Chelsea and Westminster Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.
Maria JalmbrantSloane Court Clinic, UK.
Karen JoashDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Charlottes and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, UK.
Benjamin P JonesDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, UK; and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Charlottes and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College NHS Trust, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 has created many challenges for women in the perinatal phase. This stems from prolonged periods of lockdowns, restricted support networks and media panic, alongside altered healthcare provision.

aimsWe aimed to review the evidence regarding the psychological impact on new and expecting mothers following changes to antenatal and postnatal service provision within the UK throughout the pandemic.

methodWe conducted a narrative literature search of major databases (PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar). The literature was critically reviewed by experts within the field of antenatal and perinatal mental health.

resultsChanges to service provision, including the introduction of telemedicine services, attendance of antenatal appointments without partners or loved ones, and lack of support during the intrapartum period, are associated with increased stress, depression and anxiety. Encouraging women and their partners to engage with aspects of positive psychology through newly introduced digital platforms and virtual service provision has the potential to improve access to holistic care and increase mental well-being. An online course, designed by Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust in response to changes to service provision, focuses on postnatal recovery inspiration and support for motherhood (PRISM) through a 5-week programme. So far, the course has received positive feedback.

conclusionsThe pandemic has contributed to increased rates of mental illness among pregnant and new mothers in the UK. Although the long-term implications are largely unpredictable, it is important to anticipate increased prevalence and complexity of symptoms, which could be hugely detrimental to an already overburdened National Health Service.

Indexed as

anxiety disorderscommunity mental health teamspatientsPerinatal psychiatrypsychosocial interventions

Identifiers

PMID36636816
PMCPMC9874036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.