Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36636787›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001)2023

Evaluation of outcome associated with feline trauma: A Veterinary Committee on Trauma registry study.

Carly W Gregory, Akaterina M Davros, Darren M Cockrell, Kelly E Hall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carly W GregoryDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5098-2220
Akaterina M DavrosDepartment of Clinical Sciences, North Carolina State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1469-2856
Darren M CockrellDepartment of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Kelly E HallDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University College of Veterinary Medicine, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5399-932X

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) UL1TR002494NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate outcome (survival to discharge) among trauma types (blunt, penetrating, both) in cats. Secondary objectives were to evaluate for associations between trauma type, injury severity, and the diagnostics and interventions selected by primary clinicians.

designRetrospective evaluation of veterinary trauma registry data.

settingVeterinary Committee on Trauma (VetCOT) veterinary trauma centers (VTCs). ANIMALS: A total of 3895 feline trauma patients entered in the VetCOT trauma registry from April 1, 2017 to December 31, 2019.

interventionsData collected included patient demographics, trauma type, Abdominal Fluid Score (AFS), Animal Trauma Triage (ATT) score, surgical intervention, glide sign on Thoracic Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma, Triage, and Tracking (TFAST), pleural effusion on TFAST, modified Glasgow Coma Scale (mGCS), and outcome (survival to discharge). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsData from 3895 cats were collected over a 30-month period. Incidence of trauma types was as follows: blunt, 58% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 56%-59%); penetrating, 35% (95% CI: 34%-37%); and combination, 7.4% (95% CI: 6.7%-8.3%). Differences in survival incidence among the trauma types were identified: blunt, 80% (95% CI: 78%-81%); penetrating, 90% (95% CI: 89%-92%); and combined, 68% (95% CI: 63%-74%) (P < 0.01). Cats in the penetrating trauma group had the lowest proportion of severe injuries (6%) and highest proportion of mGCS of 18 (89%); cats with combined trauma had the highest proportion of severe injuries (26%) and lowest proportion of mGCS of 18 (63%). Point-of-care ultrasound and surgery were not performed in the majority of cases. When surgery was performed, the majority of blunt cases' procedures occurred in the operating room (79%), and the majority of penetrating cases' procedures were performed in the emergency room (81%).

conclusionsCats suffering from penetrating trauma had the best outcome (survival), lower ATT scores, and higher mGCS overall. Cats that sustained a component of blunt trauma had a lower survival rate, higher ATT scores, and the highest proportion of mGCS <18.

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesWounds, NonpenetratingAnimalsCatsEmergency Service, HospitalInjury Severity ScoreRegistriesRetrospective StudiesTriageAnimal Trauma Triage scorebluntmodified Glasgow Coma Scalepenetratingpoint-of-care ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID36636787
PMCPMC10033423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.