Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36636746›Full record

ReviewGeoHealth2023

Mortality Attributable to Ambient Air Pollution: A Review of Global Estimates.

A Pozzer, S C Anenberg, S Dey, A Haines, J Lelieveld, S Chowdhury

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in GeoHealth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The impact of air pollution on petcare utilization.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A PozzerMax Planck Institute for Chemistry Mainz Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2440-6104
S C AnenbergMilken Institute School of Public Health Washington University Washington DC USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9668-603X
S DeyIndian Institute of Technology Delhi Delhi India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0604-0869
A HainesLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8053-4605
J LelieveldMax Planck Institute for Chemistry Mainz Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6307-3846
S ChowdhuryMax Planck Institute for Chemistry Mainz Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the publication of the first epidemiological study to establish the connection between long-term exposure to atmospheric pollution and effects on human health, major efforts have been dedicated to estimate the attributable mortality burden, especially in the context of the Global Burden of Disease (GBD). In this work, we review the estimates of excess mortality attributable to outdoor air pollution at the global scale, by comparing studies available in the literature. We find large differences between the estimates, which are related to the exposure response functions as well as the number of health outcomes included in the calculations, aspects where further improvements are necessary. Furthermore, we show that despite the considerable advancements in our understanding of health impacts of air pollution and the consequent improvement in the accuracy of the global estimates, their precision has not increased in the last decades. We offer recommendations for future measurements and research directions, which will help to improve our understanding and quantification of air pollution-health relationships.

Indexed as

global estimateshealth impactoutdoor air pollution

Identifiers

PMID36636746
PMCPMC9828848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.