Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36636622›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2023

Evidence-Based Consensus Guidelines Series for MicroPulse Transscleral Laser Therapy - Surgical Technique, Post-Operative Care, Expected Outcomes and Retreatment/Enhancements.

Tomas M Grippo, Marc Töteberg-Harms, Michael Giovingo, Brian A Francis, Ronald R M P C de Crom, Brian Jerkins, Jacob W Brubaker, Jella An, Nathan Radcliffe, Robert Noecker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Outcomes of MicroPulseJournal of current glaucoma practice
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Tomas M GrippoGrippo Glaucoma and Cataract Center, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-0000-256X
Marc Töteberg-HarmsDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA.
Michael GiovingoCook County Health, Chicago, IL, USA.
Brian A FrancisDepartment of Ophthalmology, Doheny and Stein Eye Institutes, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ronald R M P C de CromUniversity Eye Clinic, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Brian JerkinsDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hamilton Eye Institute, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.
Jacob W BrubakerSacramento Eye Consultants, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Jella AnDepartment of Ophthalmology, Wilmer Eye Institute, John Hopkins School of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7811-8357
Nathan RadcliffeGlaucoma Department, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3976-6831
Robert NoeckerOphthalmic Consultants of Connecticut, Fairfield, CT, USA.
Augusta University · USCook County Health and Hospitals System · USMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLMinnesota Eye Consultants · USNational Eye Institute · USNew York Eye and Ear Infirmary · USOphthalmic Consultants of Long Island · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To provide expert consensus and evidence-based current guidelines on treatment technique, postoperative care, expected outcomes and retreatment for MicroPulse Transscleral Laser Treatment (TLT). Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed led to the identification and analysis of 61 studies on MicroPulse TLT. To provide guidance in areas where there was not enough available literature, a three-round Delphi method was conducted involving 10 international experts in MicroPulse TLT. Results: The response rate was 70% in the first round, 70% in the second round, and 80% in the third round of the Delphi method. Once all responses were aggregated, a live meeting was held with 90% attendance, and consensus was achieved on each of the findings detailed in this manuscript. Conclusion: Used within appropriate treatment parameters, with proper technique and patient selection, MicroPulse TLT is a safe and effective treatment for many types and severities of glaucoma. MicroPulse TLT represents a useful addition to the glaucoma armamentarium.

Indexed as

glaucomaMicroPulsetransscleral laser treatment

Identifiers

PMID36636622
PMCPMC9831072
OpenAlexW4313554924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.